![]() |
Neither do I- if the crappy Evx2 can handle a pair of 700Ho motors just about on 4s lipo, the MM shouldnt have any issues for sure.
|
Quote:
|
<table x:str="" style="border-collapse: collapse; table-layout: fixed; width: 777px; top: 16px; left: 0px; height: 257px;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <col style="width: 75pt;" span="2" width="100"> <col style="width: 74pt;" span="2" width="98"> <col style="width: 56pt;" width="75"> <col style="width: 87pt;" width="116"> <col style="width: 69pt;" width="92"> <col style="width: 72pt;" width="96"> <tbody><tr style="height: 36pt;" height="48"> <td class="xl24" style="width: 75pt;" width="100">Motor</td> <td class="xl24" style="width: 74pt;" width="98">Output @ 16.8V</td> <td class="xl24" style="width: 74pt;" width="98">RPMs @ 16.8V</td> </tr> <tr class="xl25" style="height: 31.5pt;" height="42"> <td class="xl26" style="width: 75pt;" width="100">Traxxas Titan</td> <td class="xl27" style="width: 74pt;" width="98">About 160 watts</td> <td class="xl28" style="width: 74pt;" x:num="25,000" width="98">25,000</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 60pt;" height="80"> <td class="xl29" style="width: 75pt;" width="100">Revolver 700</td> <td class="xl30" style="width: 74pt;" width="98">252 watts</td> <td class="xl31" style="width: 74pt;" x:num="29,400" width="98">29,400</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 60pt;" height="80"> <td class="xl29" style="width: 75pt;" width="100">Revolver 700-HO</td> <td class="xl30" style="width: 74pt;" width="98">363 Watts</td> <td class="xl31" style="width: 74pt;" x:num="27860" width="98">27,860</td> </tr> <tr style="display: none;" height="0"><td style="width: 75pt;" width="100"></td><td style="width: 75pt;" width="100"></td><td style="width: 74pt;" width="98"></td><td style="width: 74pt;" width="98"></td><td style="width: 56pt;" width="75"></td><td style="width: 87pt;" width="116"></td><td style="width: 69pt;" width="92"></td><td style="width: 72pt;" width="96"></td></tr></tbody></table>
|
Ok, how about the physical difference? The 700 HO must have better qual windings and magnets, as it seems have a similar kv to the reg 700. I guess that explains the cost. For my purposes the 700 motors Neil linked to will be more than enough.
|
I think the 700HO motors have 5 pole armatures, rather than 3 poles on the normal 700s... I think.
|
Sorry I meant to link to it.:lol: Don't waste on other big brushed motors, believe me I have tried them all. Not even close to the dewalts. Here http://www.robotcombat.com/products/dewalt_motors.html The motors I have are the "new" 18 volt motor. The speed controller I used is on this site also.
|
Quote:
Maybe I would only need 1 of them? I really can't see a brushed motor doing more than 500 watts... |
I can remember several years ago guys were running the 18v dewalt motor single setup on 16.8 volt nimh and getting around 32-33 mph in the e-maxx. I think one would be plenty for your application.
|
I think the MM would be easily able to take them...
|
Quote:
|
So I have decided to try the titans first. Looks like 13/72 gearing will do the job.
|
Remember that the mamba max won't have to switch phase with a brushed motors so it should be able to handle 200-300 amps instead of 100(Of course i doubt that Castle would warranty it at those amp even in brushed mode). It's not for nothing that manufacturer have problem doing brushless controller.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.astroflight.com/index.php...products_id=85 http://www.astroflight.com/index.php...products_id=87 http://www.astroflight.com/index.php...roducts_id=126 http://www.astroflight.com/index.php...roducts_id=128 The astro cobalt 90 is said to be able to replace a .90 glow engine on a plane... 1500-1600 watts continuous which is near a neu 1521 but at 2 pound. The good point though is that controller handling brushed motors are more robust... |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.