| SunnyHouTX |
05.24.2010 06:18 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
(Post 366377)
I would guess that the times are quicker with the MMM for two main reasons:
1. The MMM has a little lower resistance than the MM, so currents to the motor will be higher (and thus, more torque).
2. The MMM has a more sophisticated back-EMF circuit and a faster processor, and can lock timing earlier than the MM. (and thus, higher torque earlier...)
|
Yes, that makes sense. I also love the 10AWG battery wires, which also lend to lower resistance compared to the 13AWG wires on the MMs. I now use 10AWG wires on the motor side as well. Thanks again Patrick.
BTW, YGPM Patrick.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasSP
(Post 366389)
So what if any advantages could be had using the MMpro over the MMM. Obviously understanding the MMM is capable of more power. Also I would be noting sensorless vs sensorless running the same theoretical motor since the MMM cannot run sensored.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by snellemin
(Post 366393)
The mmpro is good when using the cheat mode. Extra 100 watts of power with ease. Higher rollout startups are achievable with the MMpro as well. Smartsense is usefull here.
|
I have found (through trial) that the MMPro is not suitable for pro class drag racing, which is what I primarily participate in. By pro class I mean non-index (bracket included) "heads-up" racing. However, the MMPro is a favorite in index and bracket classes around the country.
As a side note, the fastest 6ft time that I'd personally witnessed was by Todd Commons from Australia with his 6S Extreme Class Dragster when he came to race in San Antonio for last year's Worlds. It was 0.177s and I believe his ET was 1.26s. My best 6ft from last weekend was 0.186s which is only 0.011 off from Todd's. I shudder to think what my ET's would be on 3S whenever I sought out traction issues on the big end. Todd also uses MMMs in his rides. |
