Hey man i was looking at the revo yesterday and i thought good truck but today beings i was so board i looked at each picture very closly for like a minute each and i realized how you mounted the motor. that is so cool and sick. Great job not only on the looks but one the machining and the design to allow you to use the stock motor mount(which is very strong because it has to hold the 3.3 power) using the existing motor mount gives extra stregnth to the motor mount your made nice job!!. i do not have a revo but if i did and i wanted to go electric and i wanted to use the stock revo trans i would want something like that (very clean, sharp, looks prrofessional). Man you should talk to monster mike and see about selling that motor mount because people would buy it NICE Again

blast Off
 

Ok, I took it for a spin today and man does it go. Very strong from a stand still (I forgot how much torque electric motors have, been running nitro's too long). Had to loosen up the slipper a little because I was worried the spur would lose some teeth. The disk brake works great, I had to loosen them up as well (way too strong). It was getting dark and I didn't have anyone around to hold the radar gun so I didn't get any speed readings (coming soon). I did get a chance to weight it on my super duper Oregon Scientific model BWR102 scale. Using generic 3000 mAh batteries the E-Revo weighted in at 10.3 lbs. Without the batteries it weighted 8.8 lbs. My almost bone stock Nitro Revo weighted 8.7 lbs. So not too bad.

You obviously weren't that bored since you didn't read this:

Wow
 

Ok some new pictures. I added a handmade antenna mount, the ESC looked way to vulneraleble so I put the rollbar back on. Since it is heavier I went one spring stiffer front and back.

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993077.jpg

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993076.jpg

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993079.jpg
Normal Pro-line Badland at rest

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993078.jpg
Hitting the throttle. Good test of your tire gluing skills.

who makes those decals on the wheels? oh nice conversion too.

when i said i was board(i meant the site did not have any new posts for a while so i decided to take a closer look at the revo pics(without reading all the replies-very stupid of me) i saw the motor mount and then had to comment AFTER i posted my comment i then read where he got it from and i kind of felt bad he already answered it ) SORRY:007:

Radar
 

I was able to make a few runs today before it got too dark. Unfortunetly I only had some 3900 mHa 6 cell Ni-Mh packs and I wasn't even sure they were fully charged. Anyways I made some runs of about 100 feet and the best I could do was 36 mph. I am running a 40T spur and a 15T pinion. I made about 10 full speed runs and the motor and ESC were cool to the touch. Does that speed sound ok with the setup I used? The accelleration was very strong, and the truck was very quick it just seemed that the top speed was a little low.


http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993505.jpg

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993507.jpg



Happy Holidays

If both the motor and ESC were cool, I'd gear up to the 38T spur and see how that does. If everything is still cool, go to the 36T spur.

ive got the 36t spur on a 16t pinion, and after about 20mins of speed runs and off roading it, the esc is warmish to the touch .

Questions
 

Ok, I decided to work on the body and I discovered that the body wouldn't clear the ESC when mounted in the back. So I decided to move the ESC to the right side of the tranny. Body now fits, ESC proctected. Originally I wanted the CG centered left to right and slightly bias toward the rear. With the batteries mounted side saddle there is more weight on the left side (battery plus motor on left, battery, ESC, receiver on right). But, mounted side saddle the batteries are very low which lowers the CG, and theroetically should make it corner better. I decided to experiment and I mounted a carbon fiber plate on top of the rear shocks, using some alloy brackets and the rear body mount. On this I added the left side battery, so I had a battery on top and one on the right side. In this configuration the CG was almost perfectly balanced left to right with a rear bias, just what I wanted. But with one battery mounted on top this moved the CG higher. The top configuration I assume would be similar to a Revo conversion using the E-Maxx tranny with the motor mounted on top. The utimate test I guess would be to try both configurations on the track and see which works out better. I appreciate your feedback and suggestions.



http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993529.jpg
Body trimmed and mounted.

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993530.jpg
ESC moved.


http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993531.jpg
CF top plate mounted.

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993528.jpg
Pack mounted on top.

http://www.pix8.net/pro/pic/2813KUH0k/993532.jpg
Side view.




Happy Holidays.

Why do you put the batteries further to the rear? It's a heck of a mass, sitting relative high and far to the rear.

Gearing
 

Regarding the gearing, I have a problem. Using the special motor mount I can only use the 40T spur and 15T pinion. I cannot move the mount any further to the right to adjust for smaller Spurs or pinions. This is because I am using the Revo Mod 1 gears. The mount was originally designed to use the stock 48pitch gears off an E-Maxx. I like the Mod 1's because they are stronger. I guess I could drill and re-tap some new holes to allow me more adjustment, but there isn't much selection in Mod 1 pinions with a 3mm bore hole and the largest spur traxxas makes for the Revo is a 40. I could probably mod a truggy spur to fit, but that would be more work. And on the track I race on, 36 mph top speed and super strong accelleration works out perfectly.

Serum, It's just that with a battery and motor on one side and a single battery on the other the CG is heavily bias to the side with the battery and motor. I am worried that the handling will be adversly impacted. The track where I race has several double and triple jumps and the thought of a left side heavy 10.5 pound MT hitting those jumps at speed could be trouble. I imagine it would start pulling left after each jump. I agree that with the batteries sitting so far back and high that it seems like it probably won't handle very well. But Like I said, It will be easy for me to move the batteries around to see how the different battery configurations effect the handling. I won't be able to run it in the dirt for a while (Holidays). Thanks for the feedback.

Maybe "machine" out the mesh slots on the mount for more range??

BTW: The person who made your mount actually uses 32p gears IIRC. Maybe see if the Jato 54T spur fits there? It might not since it is kinda large in diameter compared to the Mod1 40T, but might fit since you have the spur spacer...

BrianG, as you may already know the 40T mod 1 spur comes very close to the chassis. There really isn't much room for a larger Mod 1 spur gear. With a 48P spur you can probably squeeze in a slightly bigger (numerically more teeth) gear because they are physicaly smaller. I may go that route eventually, if track testing shows I need the gear (lower) change. The slots on the mount are pretty much as close to the edges as you could make them. As I said you would have to drill and tap new screw holes to be able to use smaller Mod 1 pinion/spur gears. The accelleration is fine, I was just a little worried about the top speed, which would require a smaller spur/pinion. I need to radar my nitro Revo to see how they compare, I don't trust the Traxxas advertisments (40+ mph). Also, I don't think the gear box was shifting into 2nd gear. So I need to adjust the transmission shift point to make it shift sooner, to see if this makes a differnce. Overall I am very happy with the conversion, because with one as complicated as this it normally takes several prototypes to get it perfect. And there is a lot of fine tuning that still needs to be done (gearing, close ratio gears, shifting adjustment, more powerful batteries, different tires, battery placement, CG adjustments, etc.). This will require track time and that will have to wait until the new year..


Regards