![]() |
It might not change the power output, but it will certainly have more torque.
|
Usually, a higher pole motor will have more torque, but a 4 poler can have more, even a 2 pole.
Ex. - Does a Neu motor have twice the torque of a Lehner motor because it's 4 pole, certainly not. :wink: |
It's hard to compare Neu and LMT because they are totally different. Neu is 4 pole but uses slotted stators. The LMT is 2 pole but uses "air core" stators. Each type has advantages, but generally anything in that price range will be VERY similar performance-wise.
|
does the plettenberg shadow have 6 poles as well or is that 4 poles?
|
Something else to consider is gearing limitations. A motor spinning at 60k and geared for 40 MPH will deliver more torque to the wheels than the same motor spinning at 30k and geared for the same 40 MPH.
A 2 pole motor spinning at 30k RPM and geared for X top speed should deliver less torque to your wheels than a 6 pole motor of similar size/weight spinning at the same speed and geared for the same top speed. Many people here target 30-40k RPM motor speeds because of gearing and top speed practicalities. But it's usually easier to gear high than to gear low, so a low Kv, high pole count motor is preferred IMHO. A high pole count motor naturally spins slower which allows you to get more torque to your wheels because you don't have to gear so low to get the mechanical torque advantage. A 6 pole or more motor should work great. I'm going to be using a Neu 1900 which is 8 poles. I was looking at these Plettys a while ago and I seem to recall that the Neu motors looked more efficient on paper, so decided to go Neu. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Plettenbergs quality is second to none and are easily the same quality as Neu's or Lehners if not even a little better , I have all three in a variety of sizes . The pletts are enormously powerful and have huge torque for there size . the big maximum is based on the plett 220 frame, Neu's on the other hand are probably the most efficient out of the three............:yes: |
hi
yes the quality of the plettenberg is above reproach. we run severeal of those motors here only in very dirty offroad applications. i have one here that is used all-season since autumn 2003 with zero issues. still no play on the bearings or anything. it runs like on the first day. they are designed for offroad applications and need no modifications for that like others do. bye rhylsadar |
so i'm still considering either a BM or a 1515/1y. Which would be a better choice if i was to run on 6s??
I know that the BM's max rpm is upto 70,000, whereas the Neu's is only 60,000. Would that play much of a part? thanks jordan |
Quote:
|
Quote:
so, any input on the motor situation? thanks jordan |
the two motors are both like 2200 rpmv.
maybe with 6s you want to go with a lower rpm/v motor ( in the range of 1500 rpmv). btw the missing availability of many different windings is the biggest (and maybe only) drawback of the plettenberg. but i may be wrong and that NEU and/or the bigmaxx run good on 6s. it seems to me you go in a rather high rpm range. i guess correct gearing would be important. rhylsadar |
Why not just run 4s?
|
Quote:
I think i'll go with the pletty, primarily because on the website it says that the motor can handle 6s in a savage. Whereas i'm not to sure if the 1515/1y will be able to handle 6s for long amounts of time without something going wrong. jordan |
How well do the pletts run on the quark monster pro? Anyone know? How does the BigMaxximum compare to the Neu 1521 series?
|
Quote:
plettenberg runs good on the quark. rhylsadar |
I guess it doesn't directly 'state' it. But check out the table down the bottom of the page.
http://www.plettenberg-motoren.com/UK/Anwend/car.htm I'm looking at various 'bigger' brushless motors now, similar to a lehner 2240, but not that exact motor as its WAY to expensive, 300 euros :gasp: What Neu's are the equivalent of such motors, would it be the 1521 or 1527 series? Looking at it, probably the best to run on 6s would be the 1521/1y or the 1521/1.5D. I know these motors produce bucketloads of torque, but do they still give good top end speed? On Brian's calculator the 1521/1y on 6s would only hit 37mph, is that accurate? Enter Front/Rear Differential Gear Ratio: UE 1/8 scale Enter Transmission Gear Ratio: E-maxx 2nd gear Enter Spur Gear tooth count: 51 Enter Pinion Gear tooth count: 19 Enter total battery voltage: 22.2 Enter kv rating of brushless motor: Neu 1521/1Y (1577 kv) Enter tire diameter in inches: 5.8 Adjusted Vehicle Speed: 37 mph (60 km/h) sorry for all the questions, i'm a newb at these larger motors :oops: jordan |
I wouldn't advice to use a bigmaxx on 6S.
|
hi
yeah very difficult to say. i have no experience with a big maxx on 6s. however any motor with around 2200 rpmv seems a bit 'hot' on 6s regardless of being a pletti or NEU or whatever. the 1521 1y seems to be more in the 'normal' area for that voltage. bye rhylsadar |
Between 1500-1800 seems to be the Kv range that will work good in a 6S set up. Some people do run a good quality motor beyond that though and have good luck.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
heres a 1521 on 6s
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bo7GdkNpKAY&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bo7GdkNpKAY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> |
wow, that looks great satttheman, how is the top speed of the 1521. Looks like its got way more than enough torque :oh:
you're running a 1521 as well aren't you lutach? |
Quote:
|
i clocked mines at 57mph which was to fast it was hard as h*ll to control
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.