![]() |
Quote:
BTW -- we are using the temp sensor on the processor -- so make sure any mods you do reduce the temp difference between the FETs and the processor, not the opposite. What does that mean -- 2 month clean-room run? Are you thinking about getting On Semiconductor to give us some Fab time, or what? |
Quote:
I know, on first versions I was adding copper spacer, but lately reusing your foam, works alright. :) Something like that, but not at On Semiconductor, more like proto run at University and upon success, I do not know it is way too early. |
Quote:
The copper heat sinks did work very well, but were very expensive. On Semiconductor has done some custom stuff for us in the past -- they might be willing to listen. |
Quote:
Well, now that is when we switch to PM. By the way, I am pretty sure, you've seen that :) |
you might as well except for Brian and a few others nobody has a clue as to what you and Patrick are talking about......:-)
|
Quote:
Sure is a lot easier to build a high power controller when you only have a single phase... Probably just a couple Eupec IGBTs. Pretty simple. -- What isn't talked about is the RADIATOR that that controller requires -- and water pump, and plumbing... 2 watts of loss per amp just for forward drop, minimum. IGBT drivers can be a challenge in three phase setups, but single phase is a breeze. |
Fresh
Even in the best think tanks having a fresh perspective is always a good thing. We all know how secretive any company can be about protecting its investment on any project, so seeing you (Patrick) discuss specs with a fellow R/C junkie who obviously has some insight is great. We have all heard Griffen spew technical stuff in an effort to improve things with ESC MFG and he has modded some MM's with impresive results. So maybe if you two get to share some fresh ideas we will benefit in the long run. Nice to see you communicating on this. Good luck guys.
|
Quote:
It wouldn't be too hard to do a 400V MOSFET based 3 phase controller for an EV. And it wouldn't be hard to do a PM motor for it either (expensive magnets though...) Both ST and Infineon have some nice 500V MOSFETs now (that don't have 1000nC charges.) Need to sleep now, but I'm thinking about it. :wink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am less concern about cooling, can fix that. If you can get me some ESC's already pre-fabbed with caps and tvs, I would like to share with you one more aspect of this tuning. I am sure you aware of that, but still. Pushing 30V fet's towards 6S is not great and we have seen more than one catastrophic fet's failure. What I was trying to add to MM, but didn't find a good place, is tvs per phase, not across H-bridge. 3 TVS total, no TVS across power leads required if caps are good and leads are short. Concern - V=L*di/dt With higher Kv motors, motors inductance and fast high current switching can exceed fet rating pretty quick. It would be the best to place clamp that would be before fet's diodes. If you have any catastrophic fet's failures (I had one unit from DickyT) than it might be related to that. Neu 1515 1.5D has about 2.3uH @ 50Amps and 1us it can hit 115V, your are not clamping phase - but just a thought. Need to go, see you next weekend, |
Quote:
Notice you never see those high voltages (115V) in a MMM or MM, because the body diodes clamp WAY before avalanche occurs. But there are several improvements that can be made beyond what the MMM has. First -- the body diodes do clamp to rail +- 1.5V or so, but they are slow. The snubbers are faster, but can't handle enough power -- bigger snubbers make a huge difference. The whole idea is giving that energy a place to go that is LOW resistance path, not a high resistance path like a TVS. That energy of the inductor doesn't have to be wasted in a resistive part -- it can be recaptured, re-routed, restored. :yes: |
Quote:
Hundreds of ps are not that slow (it is possible to get faster devices but then substrate size (to maintain current capacity) will increase capacitance, thus slow you, limit you) , and there is no need to clamp all the way to zero, just to the safe Fet's level, and fet's are not that fast. But overtime both of them degradate, TVS first (easy to replace) fet second. Temp also change their response. Diodes are also rated to max Fet’s voltage, they are by-product of Fet. So you will exceed diode ratings if you do not clamp it earlier with something rated at higher voltage. You got the idea. There is no much energy there to recuperate, but plenty to damage. Just switching fronts I am talking, nothing else. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fairchild also has some interesting high voltage parts, but is still a generation behind ST and Infineon in RDSon / die size. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.