![]() |
Bad news for future MM users.
Quote:
|
Why would they do this?
I'm guessing they have spent more money on replacing fried ESCs than they have sold because of the tempting voltage limits, lol. |
Thats a shame... the MM in larger scale cars was starting to get very popular. I bet there will many many of those MM ESC's on ebay now...
BTW - how can you tell if it is the old version or new version? |
Patrick is probably having trouble procuring the MOSFETs. I already told him in rcgroups I can help with that, but no answer yet from him.
|
Novak is "notorious" for under-specing speed controls. But, you can see what's happened to Castle. They spec the MM for 3s lipos and many users figure that 4s or 5s lipos should be OK.
The 4s or 5s lipo info becomes conventional wisdom out here in R/C forum-land. Then users believe that MM's damaged from over-voltage should be replaced "for free." I have seen comments in various fora where a racer will admit to using an esc waaay out of spec but still think it should be covered by the warranty. A vicious cycle. Often the factory can't really tell what causes the damage, so the customer is given the benefit of the doubt. |
Castle should make the overvolt protection switchable in the setup menu. That way regular users could leave it on and retain the warranty coverage and the rest of us can switch it off and pay the fees if we cook it. Hell, they could even have different charges for repairs if it was switched off. Personally if I cook one trying too run to high gearing on a heavy vehicle it is my fault. I have had excellent service from castle on a lot of their products and never had a charge from them. Anyway, the 50 bucks should cover their cost of an esc. Just my 2 cents, can't blame them for cvering their butts:wink:
|
Honestly, the MM should be easily capable of 4s since it is rated for 12 cells, which is VERY close in voltage (both right-off-the-charger and nominal). There's even a 4s LVC setting. However, I've always thought 5s was too much to expect, and still don't think it should be used in larger vehicles even though it could technically work.
|
My MM worked flawless today on 4S. It was only warm after about 8 minutes. Now days any manufacture should come out with ESC that can handle 6S without a sweet. If the FETs have a rating of 30V or more they should be able to handle 6S and make it the limit. They should also offer ESC capable of 12S lipos for those who likes to run HV and less AMPS.
|
I tried my MM with 14 cells and no go. I got the red and green lights. I will try it w/ 4s next and see what happens...
BTW cogging was horrible at 17/52 |
I've been using my non-new (but not terribly old) Mamba Max 4600 system in a XTM X-Cellerator on 4s 4800mah 20C Lipo for a couple weeks now and have had absolutely no problems with the ESC or motor. And to think, the truck is geared for roughly 65-70mph, and the motor doesn't get hot, and there hasn't been a thermal shutdown yet. The power is so great that I can easily flip over after pegging the throttle while going 45mph.
There is also a CCBEC in use. |
Well maybe Castle should put an and to all this BS and just release the MMM. Not that expect them too or anything. I gave up on Castle months ago.
|
Castle, Tekin and Novak must be staffed with a bunch of short-sighted bafoons. There is a growing market that is not being addressed. The big truck/conversion group is probably one of the few segments in the industry that is seeing gains.
Novak could easily manufacture their HV-Maxx with a 5mm shaft...today. What's so hard about that? Castle and Tekin, with their information "leaks" are acting like slimy politicians. They let out info to see how people will react and hold interest so we don't forget about them. My take on all this is that the brains at these companies are not a savvy as one would assume. There are some smart folks here at the forums and elsewhere that have taken things into their own hands and improved on the manufactured product. Why not hire some of them, Tekin and CC? How about some REAL hobbyists on staff. People who actually participate in the hobby and have a passion for it? Let's face it. MONSTER Mamba Max is just a name of a project. Same with Tekin's "whatevertheycallit." If they had a controller, they would sell it. There's a huge potential for profit. A companies success is based on profit. So why don't they jump on it? Because they don't know how. They need better people. |
Quote:
|
Good luck guys. I hope you the very best of luck. Yes, indeed.
Soon, I'll be getting married and leave this sorrowful world of RC for ever. I'm leaving this forum as of today, as well as all of the other RC forums...I feel sick of brushless, nitro and everything regarding RC....aaaaaahhhhhh fewy!!! Now if you'll excuse me, I need to sleep for a while..:sleep: i'm lying... |
Well, speaking for some of the buffoons......
Novak--especially Bob---has been toiling away on several conversion kits for the most popular 1/8th scale nitro RTRs. His office is full of nitro vehicles and many little plastic parts.. Bob is a pretty busy guy---he should probably retire, but then do what? So, he toils on. It is a very slow project, but there are sure signs that things are speeding up. The Novak HV projects are on target for early '08. We don't say much on the forums--don't want to get slimed for raising expectations. Our systems are sensored and you monster guys aren't waiting expectantly for sensored brushless items, anyway. I don't know about the "huge potential for profit" thing. It always reminds me of the old joke: How can you make a small fortune in the R/C industry? Start with a large fortune. Quote:
|
Speaking of sensored/sensorless, do you have any plans on making a sensorless ESC anytime in the future - or at least an ESC that can do both?
I know that sensored have smoother starts with zero cogging, but some of today's sensorless ESCs are getting pretty darned good about that. The Quark specifically is very good about this. Most conversion kits are just a matter of a motor mount and a battery tray, and maybe a new spot to hold the ESC/receiver/UBEC. Most people can make, or have access to buy, the mounts, so it's mostly a matter of finding an ESC/motor that is powerful enough for our desires. :) Also, while you're on here, I've heard that the Novak systems are kinda sensitive to gearing. Gear very much beyond the recommended value causes pretty major issues. With these sensorless systems, we can gear up as high as temps allow... |
Quote:
|
Cool, thanks for taking the time to answer my questions! :)
Yeah, I suppose you have to build "for the masses" and not for some of us niche power freaks. Not too many emaxx people will want to fork out two 6s-7s cell packs for 12s-14s total. |
Much of our time is spent winding and testing slower motors for stock/spec racing---oval, especially. Oval organizations and leagues are establishing BL/Lipo spec events, which is a pretty exciting development.
We have released the 17.5T motor, are about to release the 21.5T, and waiting on approval of the 25.5T motor. In addition we just started shipping the new Crawler products. Maybe next year, we can concentrate on faster items! The industry really needs to attract more beginners, and many race directors think our BL 13.5T motors are too fast. I realize that forum members here are all about speed, so slower motors and beginner products are not so interesting. Somewhere along the way, the word "thermalling" became a pejorative. Thermal OL protection was originally designed to warn users against wrong set-ups and bonehead mistakes. It was supposed to be a good, protective feature! |
Makes sense. Most of the people here want high speed items AND lots of diff-grinding torque. :) And most here with those types of systems understand the technology and are able to piece together systems. Beginners need plug-n-play systems, but eventually those beginners will become BL freaks like us (hopefully).
|
Quote:
|
NovakTwo... there is plenty of money to be made in the RC industry . I recall seeing some very nice brand new facilities of r/c companies and that doesn't happen by losing money.
Like any industry... some have failed... some have barely made it... and some have made a fortune. I doubt anyone thinks r/c companies are due to make an appearance on Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous... but please spare us the poor-boy act. Novak is in it for the $$$ like everyone else. |
Quote:
|
A few hundred mexicans working in a sweat-shop. In all seriousness though, I would happily kill lots of people for a proper HV sensored system, even if it was just a basic plug & play jobby with very little programming options. The HvMaxx esc is fine enough, and I have had great success with it, but it would be nice if it was 6s capable, and the motor more powerful; the 380 rotor is its biggest failing- fine for stock trucks, but a heavy Maxx needs a bit more power to get it moving. I will commend you and Bob for all the work you do though, as without it I would probably be running brushed motors (God forbid!)...
|
You probably shouldn't bring up "passion" for the R/C industry. Bob got involved in R/C planes when he was a young boy and spent his entire working career in the industry. Novak has been around for 30 years, so the company has had years of involvement in the industry. We even know all of the people who have sold their companies---Losi, Associated, Orion/Peak.
But, I think what you mean by passion is, why doesn't Novak make some of the cool products that posters here want. Making a few, hand made products to be sold to a select group of customers is easy. Manufacturing the products to be sold to thousands of users at prices buyers are willing to pay is another matter. There is also the matter of service. As mentioned above, some companies (such as Aveox) are not reliable when it comes to servicing their products. Therefore, Novak products have to be designed and manufactured to minimize potential service issues. Those "layer cake" controllers, while cool, are just not feasible for mfg or sale to most customers---too much potential for mis-use, damage or sub-standard performance. For every product a manufacturer replaces, or gives away, free, the company must sell 5-8 new items to recover the parts/labor/overhead costs of that free item. Bob, Adnan Khan (Novak's Senior Designer), and the entire tech staff are definitely well-informed about comments on various forums---both the complimentary ones and the not-so-flattering. So keep the ideas and comments flowing. |
Your wishes should be granted early '08.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
now thats just now right brian. :lol::mdr:
|
lol, I hope NovakTwo knows I'm just playin' :smile:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Hello Gang,
It is good to see a lot of "familiar" names still on this forum. I have not posted in a real long time and came back to see if there was any progress in the BL world. Unfortunatly I see the market has actually regressed rather than going forward (MM not handling as many cells as before). I get it that it is always about making money, as it should be. If there is no profit then the company will eventually go out of business (passion or not...), I get it! This is not a good enough reason to not develop what the market is asking for. I think a lot of the RC manufactures are missing the boat. I can't believe non of the 1/8 buggy companies have put out an electric buggy. I can't believe the BL companies do not have systems to handle 1/8 buggies, 1/8 monster trucks, 1/5 buggy/truck/cars. There is plenty of money out there...just not enough business creativity to harness it. I guess I'll take my money and spend it on other things while I wait for the RC market to get off of its A**. (See attached pic). Sorry for the rant, but I have been in the hobby for over 26 years and it is such a shame that it can't keep up with today's technology. |
Man it would take a serious setup to convert that to BL!!!
btw.... you know that doesn't have a rotary under the hood ;) |
1 Attachment(s)
The rotary is doing just fine, she just has a new playmate...:mdr:
|
Quote:
|
I think items designed and produced by individuals for these niche markets are a wonderfull way to go. Novak was a garage/kitchen table operation for quite a few years in the seventies---it was in the right place, at the right time, with the right resources. That's how new companies are born.
Little guys with no payrolls or overhead can take the chances that larger companies can no longer risk. After all, Novak has about 45 employees, who expect to be paid on a regular basis! Best wishes to Lutach and Griffin-RU---it's interesting to see what inventors can come up with. There is some guy in Thailand who has stacked Novak power boards---we can't read the copy, though, because it's in Thai.... At heart, Bob Novak has always been a "tinkerer" and, if you could see his office, you would know that his heart is still in tinkering. We just wish he worked a bit faster! Fortunately, Adnan has taken over the electronic and motor design for @ the last 20 years. The whole brushless technology revolution is exciting for electric R/C cars---if the industry can be revived, BL will do it. Nitro RTRs have really taken a huge share of the market. Maybe BL 1/8th scale products can help revive electric and bring back some of the excitement. |
As far as nitro taking the majority of the market: Most of that is probably because back in the day, the only way to get decent power was to use gas. Even today, many nitro people still snicker when they see someone plugging batteries in any vehicle... until of course they see it run. :) And then there are some that actually like the noise, smell, cleanup, tuning headaches, etc...
|
Just thought I post Joe Ford's response from The Radio Control Zone forum.
There is no difference between controllers that left on day 1 and controllers that left today. It's luck of the draw whether your specific processor on your specific controller is going to handle that much voltage. Most will not as the controller was not designed to handle anything over 3s lipo. 4s works on most...5s I wouldn't even try and I WORK HERE. |
Well, that's weird, because I have two different MM ESCs and they have different FET part numbers. The older MMs have the same part # as the ones Quark uses, while the newer MMs are different.
|
Brian,
Here is the thread and my response. I just could not resist.:slap: http://forums.radiocontrolzone.com/s...223182&page=52 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.