![]() |
Castle 2200Kv or Medusa 80mm 2000Kv
Hi there,
im going to convert an 1/8-scaly truggy (Mantis). Since the 8s-ESCs are too expensive for me I decided to get the MMM. I wonder if the MMM-Set with 2200KV-motor or the MMM-ESC with a 80mm Medusa 2000Kv would be the better option. The Truggy will weight around 4.7kg and run on 6s. It will be used for bashing only. I should rather be overpowered then underpowered. I wonder if the larger diameter of the Castle means that it produces more torque than the longer and heavier Medusa. And how do they compare in terms of efficiancy? many thanks |
If you'd rather be overpowered than underpowered, go Castle.
If you want more torque, go Castle If you want more efficiency, go Castle. |
Quote:
|
Asheck - what cell count are you running the 36-60-2000 on in your e-REVO? What speed are you geared for and how are your temps? I'm trying to decide between the 60-1600 and 70-1600 for my e-REVO on 5s. I'm looking to get less torque than my 1515 neu 1650kv. The neu is awesome but I want something that isn't going to wheely the whole way around the track but I can still bash with!
|
I think Ascheck is right in that the efficiency and power between the Castle-Neu and Medusa 80mm will be probably very similar. The Medusa will have a *slightly* longer rotor, but the difference will be very small. All I know is that my Castle motor stays ice-cool (not literally lol...but hasn't hit over 130F).
However, the Castle motor is built much better for offroad use, IMO. Bigger bearings, and a much thicker/tougher casing. That the windings terminate inside the motor and are presoldered to nice, thick 10AWG wires makes things even easier. It's also sealed, so you won't get any rubbish inside. A word of warning though; The Castle motor on 6S will be utterly incredible! Good job you're bashing, as it'd be way too much for racing unless you have exceptional finger control.:yes: Either of those motors can produce insane amounts of power and remain cool, but I'd go for the Castle personally. It's just built better. |
Quote:
|
thanks for all the replys, i just thought the Medusa would be more powerful since it weights 60g more than the Castle-Neu.
So i think im going for the Castle-Set then and if it turns out as to aggressive i will use less cells or configure the throttle-response-curve. And if all that wont help i can still buy the Medusa later if i feel i need it, but i cannot get the Castle-Neu as cheap as i get it with the set ... so maybe i go that way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I got a reply from Mike today. He has recomended the 70mm so that's what I'm gonna go with. He was running the 60-2000 in his but said that at the end of a 20 minute run he was at the high end of the safe temp zone. I have seen Mike race and as he said he is a very smooth driver and if he was on the edge I don't want to chance it. For helping to control wheelies he has recomended playing with the settings on the controller and my radio, specifically the throttle curve. Hopefully I be placing my order before the end of the week!!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've got an 80mm Medusa in my Muggy and it's an excellent motor but nothing compares to a Neu. The price difference between the 80mm and the CC Neu is negligible, you can get a CC Neu for $140-$150 and I got my 80mm for $135. Just get the CC Neu, they're a good motor. |
Quote:
|
I have both the CC2200 and a 80mm 1600kv Medusa and an MMM for both. I was thinking that the medusa was better suited for the muggy, but after reading this thread I'm not sure.
What do you guy's think is a better combo for a muggy, and since I'm asking which for my Raze ST Truggy? Thanks Sorry if this is a hyjack. -Brian |
Quote:
On paper 2200kv is too much, especially since I plan on running 6s. If CC/Neu offered a 1600kv or thereabouts then I think it'd be a stronger argument. But as it stands, on paper, the 1600kv Medusa seems like a much better fit for 6s. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.