mgm 160 amp vs. quark monster pro
 

Opinions please!!! Not sure which one to get.

I will be getting a Neu motor, running 4s MAYBE 5s, (not sure which one yet) to go w/ either controller.

Which one is easier to program, set up.


Thanks

I would guess the Quark is easier to program from what I have heard. The choice would be yours really. I think the MGM may give you more options in battery selections down the road if needs be.

mgm is more capable and runs much cooler. The quark is a bit easier to program and operate.

J.

you say the mgm gives more options and cooler...much cooler?

I have seen many w/ both controllers, how is tech support if needed, warantee work?

And the MGM stays cooler if all reports can be believed...

I have both.... I really cant decide which is better. I really like them both for different reasons and hate them both for different reasons.

MGM
Upside:

• Runs stone cold. I havent thermalled it yet.
• PC programmable if you get the newer ones from Mike, so easier to program.

Downside:

• Has a bit of a touchy LVC and you need to use high quality lipos to not have premature LVC problems (I personally see issues with 20c, but not with 25c enerland packs)
• They still have a little bit of a funky brake, but only a low speeds and it can be completely eliminated if you run forward only.

Quark
Upside:

• Still the smoothest throttle with the least cogging around IMO. Very stable predictable brakes.
• Runs ANY brushless motor. I haven't been able to find a motor it wont run. Outrunner, 2 pole, 4 pole, 6 pole... anything.

Downside:

• Tends to run hot and at minimum a good heatsink is needed on the back of the case. Worst case is you need to do the "heat mod" to it.
• No PC programing, but its still pretty easy so not that big of a deal IMO.
• Some have cogging issues on 6s. Not a problem if you are planning to run 4 or 5s setup.

Skytech and Mike have awesome service for the Quark, not sure about the MGM as I never had one.

thanks for all your input, I have some thinking to do