RC-Monster Forums

RC-Monster Forums (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Stupid newb question (https://www.rc-monster.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9948)

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 12:39 PM

Stupid newb question
 
So, I am running a 3 cell lipo pack and under the heaviest load the battery hits 6.5v. LVC isn't quick enough to catch the dip. 3 cell lipo. When I am done with the run the pack isn't warm because the average draw was only 2-3C, but the bursts are in the 40-50C range. Is the pack damaged? Since the pack isn't warm can I say the performance didn't skip a beat?

Serum 02.03.2008 01:47 PM

Good point; is the eagletree showing these drops?

6.5V on a 3S pack is pretty deep; what is the capacity of these cells? you are mentioning 40-50C, but what current are we looking at?

It's not good for a pack to drop bellow 3-3.2V per cell; it shortens the lifespan, but so does overheating the packs. When the burst are very small, the pack simple hasn't got the time to heat up.

It's obvious that the cells are not up the task.

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 02:27 PM

Yes, eagletree logger.

Here is the discussion, it will shed more light on the situation. http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showthread.php?t=103639

I would like further opinions on the subject. I am well versed in lithium battery construction and handling, and as most in this hobby I have preconceived notions about how a pack should respond to use/abuse. I have one opinion, others see it differently.

Serum 02.03.2008 02:29 PM

what capacity are these cells you used?

As you also know; dropping bellow 6.5V on a 3S pack is simple killing batteries. You should consider an upgrade in available power.

MetalMan 02.03.2008 03:03 PM

If it were my pack, I'd continue running it this way until signs of damage presented themselves: puffing, weak cell(s), decreased capacity, increased resistance, etc. But of course that means the pack will need to be monitored pretty carefully while charging, to ensure safety.

BP-Revo 02.03.2008 03:16 PM

Thats pretty low. As already asked, I would like to know he specs of the pack (capacity, current rating, etc.).

I agree with Serum with the whole "upgrading available power" thing. Time for some FlightPowers?

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 03:19 PM

3S 1550 MA cells

Low Volts: 6.33

High watts: 696

High Amps: 101.62


mamba max ESC, crawlmaster sport motor, stalling conditions enough to make the motor puff a wisp of smoke.

jhautz 02.03.2008 03:30 PM

Thats almost a 65c burst for that pack. No wonder the voltage drop is so low. I dont know of any lipo that can withstand a 65c load. It would seem the batteries are significantly under sized.

Double the pack capacity IMO. That way the spikes are only 30-35C

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 03:38 PM

And yet when I suggest the batteries are undersized I am accused of attacking the test results with a closed mind- 'because it is the motors fault'. Impressive that they will burst the amount, until the voltage is taken into account. Maybe they should be labeled 65C cells now?

MetalMan 02.03.2008 03:44 PM

Jeeze, and your tranny/axles/tires can take that much torque? That crawler must be god-like.

jhautz 02.03.2008 03:44 PM

One way to tell is to double the capacity of the battery and rerun the test.

I noticed in the test that with the 840mah (I think that was the capacity) the amp spikes were lower than with the 1550mah pack. It looks like something is happening to cause the system to draw as much as the battery can possibly put out. If you double the pack capacity again and the amp draw continues to rise I would say there is something else worng besides the battery. Something in the system is causing the battery to basically dead short and just dump everything it can.

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 03:48 PM

The ax10 is pretty stout.

Keep in mind these are stalling tests, performed by Jason @ MA

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhautz (Post 146323)
One way to tell is to double the capacity of the battery and rerun the test.

My thoughts exactly. The data indicates that more capacity is needed. The testing is basically turning into "dead short the battery" testing at this point.

MetalMan 02.03.2008 03:52 PM

I'm just now reading through the thread. Strange.

johnrobholmes 02.03.2008 03:55 PM

Strange indeed. I don't know what I did to piss him off, but I figured I should try to drop my preconceived notions about battery usage and see what other savvy users think.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.