View Single Post
Old
  (#53)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
07.17.2009, 11:56 PM

So flightpower listed the prices of their packs on the USA website, and the prices are not too bad, definitely not like what their cost difference used to be. I also noticed another thing, IF the test above is to be believed, and now I think it IS accurate, even the discharged mah, then Hyperion overrates their specs, as far as MAH CAPACITY is concerned.

Looking at the different batteries FP has to offer:

EON X30 3800mah 3s pack - 345grams - $130

Hyperion G3 4200mah 3s pack - 345grams - $100 (actual discharged ~3950mah)

Again...

EON X30 3350mah 3s pack - 279grams - $125

Hyperion G3 3300mah 3s pack - 279grams - $80


This goes for almost the entire range of packs that are close to the same capacity, so I am sure FP and Hyperion use the same manufacturer. Also, FP seems to underrate their packs(or more conservative, take your pick), less mah rated for the same cell pack, and a lower C rating as well. So, does this deserve a ~30%+ increase in pack cost for the same thing? Are FP's going to be better matched, better voltage holding ability? Does it really increase costs that much that the consumer must pay for extra quality, wherever it may be... whatever form it may be in?

I think I am going to purchase a pair of the 3s 3800 X30's soon, see how they compare to G3's, which are 25% less. Maybe a Zippy pack is in order too.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote