[suicideneil]

I think thats one of the main issues really:

1) Its easy to claim they are the best packs on the market, to para phrase Austin, but without proof thats an empty claim.
2) Other manufacturers display graphes with discharge info, so why not MA?
3) Ignoring issues with older cells that users have experienced is not fair; if you want examples of why people dont trust MA, then you have to be prepared to listen to people's experiences of older packs (vs other companies older packs).
4) Choosing to completely ignore people's questions or critisms and running away back to the NK forum hardly looks terribly proffesional; stay the course and face upto the questions, and try to dispel the negative comments and preconceptions.
5) Give some insight into the reasoning behind ditching continuous ratings, other than 'burst ratings make more sense', as it really doesnt make any sense given the nature of ground based vehicles. At worst, burst ratings and continuous ratings should be listed, with graphs showing that the lipos can perform to those ratings- unlike the 35c pack that only manages 28c in the graph I posted (from the NK forum no less...).