RC-Monster Forums - View Single Post

kulangflow · 12.24.2010, 01:05 PM

Thanks for your response!

I did some testing last night, and it was pretty cool to see the results.

This comparison wasn't meant to show brand vs brand. All these packs are used and abused. I was just curious to see how they compared. Although the result is obvious, it's cool to see on a graph how much better the 1600 packs do in parallel than by themselves.

I did 3 full throttles for 10sec, with 10sec rest between. Then I did a 50% throttle run for 60sec, and ended with another 10sec full throttle burst. I let them recover for 45sec, then ended live mode.

	(#3)
kulangflow Never Fast Enough Offline Posts: 914 Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: UT	12.24.2010, 01:05 PM Thanks for your response! I did some testing last night, and it was pretty cool to see the results. This comparison wasn't meant to show brand vs brand. All these packs are used and abused. I was just curious to see how they compared. Although the result is obvious, it's cool to see on a graph how much better the 1600 packs do in parallel than by themselves. I did 3 full throttles for 10sec, with 10sec rest between. Then I did a 50% throttle run for 60sec, and ended with another 10sec full throttle burst. I let them recover for 45sec, then ended live mode. He's down by the river ... walking on water.