Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonwilcox
Hey Guys,
Thank you for the interest in our new packs. I will have some new videos and graphs to you shortly. I believe you will be impressed. This truly is a solid product and I believe you will be extremely happy with the performance. Rootar, If you will be at ihobby I will take you up on that bet and we can test the packs together.
Brandon
|
Maxamps has chosen to play the marketing game with the argument about C ratings for so long, it's just old.
Now, since sales are obviously sagging in this economy, (along with the fact that people are catching on.........karma you know?), Maxamps has tried several attention tricks.
First design on your "stackable" assemble-a-pack idea was a lawsuit in the making. I'm glad to see you finally got your head on, and came up with a better idea to eliminate dead shorting and the potential firebomb.
Now, It's obvious you've went back to the "True C rating" instead of the "Burst Rating", but came up with your own numbers once again.
True product competition isn't just about sticking a number on a pack. The proof is in the pudding.
But come on! 150C? That's just a lie.
If you can provide me proof, that your pack can hold even 3.0 volts per cell for 30 seconds at a 975 amp discharge, I'll buy!
IF Maxamps DID come up with such energy density and discharge capability, you would have such huge Government contracts, you would probably forget about the RC market altogether.
That's not how things are gonna go there, in the garage though, is it?