 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Neu 1512 2.5D Vs 9xl |
 |
|
 |
|
(#1)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
|
Neu 1512 2.5D Vs 9xl -
05.23.2008, 12:57 PM
I am going to purchase the Neu as soon as Mike gets them back in stock. My question is this...the Neu is 2050Kv while the 9xl is 1850kv, even though the Neu is more kv and spins faster would I see about the same runtime with both assuming the setups, were the same..(MM esc w/ 4s)..due to the efficiency of the Neu? Just curious.
2. MBX-5T 1520, MMM ON 5S 3. MBX-5 ONROAD CONVERSION 1515, MMM ON 5S 4. MRX-3 ON ROAD CONVERSION 1512, MMM ON 6S 5. TEN T 2650 T8, MMP ON 3S |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#2)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
|
06.19.2008, 06:58 PM
just wondering if anyone has an opinion on this
2. MBX-5T 1520, MMM ON 5S 3. MBX-5 ONROAD CONVERSION 1515, MMM ON 5S 4. MRX-3 ON ROAD CONVERSION 1512, MMM ON 6S 5. TEN T 2650 T8, MMP ON 3S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#3)
|
|
Im not dark, Im over ripened! xD
Offline
Posts: 5,607
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Westampton NJ
|
06.19.2008, 08:12 PM
yes, and the nue is rated for 20,00 more rpm then the xl
R/c Monster Team Driver Jq the car, LST, Sportweks turmoil pro Unconventional Techniques, Superior Results |
    |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#4)
|
|
"Out of spec" enthusiast
Offline
Posts: 820
Join Date: May 2005
|
06.21.2008, 09:49 AM
Well if you geared for the same speed, you would probably get at least 10% more runtime. I'm guessing the neu motors peak at greater than 90% efficiency whereas the feigao motors cant be more than 80% efficient.
Sub 7lb, lowest CG of any 1/8 buggy http://www.rc-monster.com/forum/show...894#post367894 Area 52 Ranch Raceway T.R.C.R. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#5)
|
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
06.21.2008, 11:19 AM
Quote:
2d is rated @ 2050 kv the run times might be comparable due to the Neus better design and you will probubly be disappointed with the performance with both motors on 4s, if 4s is your only power option go with a 1y or 1.5d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#6)
|
|
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
Offline
Posts: 463
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Malaysia
|
06.21.2008, 12:10 PM
Hi,
The 1512 is around 60mm in length while the 9XL is 74mm Regards, Joe Ling 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#7)
|
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
06.21.2008, 12:15 PM
I thought he was comparing a Neu 1515 size motor ...sorry for the misunderstanding...:-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#8)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
|
06.21.2008, 05:31 PM
No big deal!!! I am always trying to figure out the most efficient set up that I can conjure up in my head. If I could only afford it, that's the trick.
 I have a couple of 5s batts sitting around and was thinking of dropping in a 1512 3D f 1700kv. Compared to the 4s 9xl set up , it should scream and give me long run times....hummmmmm
2. MBX-5T 1520, MMM ON 5S 3. MBX-5 ONROAD CONVERSION 1515, MMM ON 5S 4. MRX-3 ON ROAD CONVERSION 1512, MMM ON 6S 5. TEN T 2650 T8, MMP ON 3S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
