RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Maxamps not up to snuff?
Old
  (#1)
Mightytaco
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 48
Join Date: Apr 2007
Maxamps not up to snuff? - 10.25.2007, 11:18 PM

I have to say im a little disappointed in these maxamps 6000 packs i have. I finally got a data logger and the results suprised me! My peak amp draw on my test run with my 1/8th scale was 98amps but the voltage dropped to 10.5 volts at a couple of points! Anyone else have similar issues with theirs? i thought these were good up to a 20c discharge. Could i have a bad pack?

My setup:
Motor 8xl
Gearing: 14/46
Batts: 2x 2cell 6000mah packs in series.
controller: MGM 16018 in "race mode"
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
10.25.2007, 11:25 PM

The 6000 packs are 3000 cells in parallel, and I can say that the 3000 cells I had puffed under less than a 50 amp load. I would say that the 6000 packs are good to 90 amps, but no more. IMO they are closer to 15c cells than 20c. The 4000 cells can handle their rated current as can the 5000, so i think that Maxamps are being optimistic with the 3000 ratings.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
cemetery gates
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
10.25.2007, 11:27 PM

In my experience, MaxAmps over rates their packs. Also, I've heard that there 6000mAh are not that great at all. I've used their 4000mAh and they perform like garbage for being a 20c pack, their more like a 10c pack. Since them Ive gone to TrueRc packs and have not looked back, they perform awesome, greater than advertised. You should really look into some Flightpower lipos(more or less top of the line lipo); they are top notch and are worth every penny, even if they are a little more expensive than others.

Hope this helps!

Bye
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
10.25.2007, 11:33 PM

I still wish that I bought the trakpower packs over my 5k maxamps packs. They were the same price to me, and I like the hard case idea, since I seem to destroy shrink by looking at it! Oh well, the 5k packs are doing fine, and may be a true 20c pack. I reserve the use of my 4k packs to 10th scale anyway.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
johnrobholmes
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
johnrobholmes's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 905
Join Date: Aug 2007
10.26.2007, 07:36 AM

From my experience and talks with industry folk, Maxamps has one thing going for them: a lot of advertising. The average user has no way of testing the actual discharge rate, so there are many many companies that fudge numbers. Kokam and Neu are some of the few that are honest. I have never dealt with flightpower packs directly, but from the runs I have seen with them they seem to keep the voltage under load.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Finnster
KillaHurtz
 
Finnster's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,958
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bucks Co, PA
10.26.2007, 01:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnrobholmes View Post
From my experience and talks with industry folk, Maxamps has one thing going for them: a lot of advertising. The average user has no way of testing the actual discharge rate, so there are many many companies that fudge numbers. Kokam and Neu are some of the few that are honest. I have never dealt with flightpower packs directly, but from the runs I have seen with them they seem to keep the voltage under load.

I am going to refrain from blasting them, as they are a guest here. But I would largely agree with the above statement in regards to many companies. I can't say every MA pack holds up to its rating, they seem a bit hit and miss, and generally they seem to take the "optimistic" rating. That's why I always go w/ TrueRC packs, they tend to underrate all their packs, plus they are considerably cheaper for what amts to the same quality of pack for the most part. Its my understanding both cells originate from the same factory ;)
I think a more realistic rating for the majority of their packs would be 15C.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
johnrobholmes
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
johnrobholmes's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 905
Join Date: Aug 2007
10.26.2007, 01:18 PM

Another point to consider, what is a true 20C pack? I see many graphs of a 2200mah 20C pack that doesn't hold 2200mah at the said discharge rate. The mah of the pack is usually derived from a 1C discharge. What is the cutoff voltage of the test too? There are no clearly defined rules for the variables tested, and average voltage isn't given for the discharge rate either.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Finnster
KillaHurtz
 
Finnster's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,958
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bucks Co, PA
10.26.2007, 04:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnrobholmes View Post
Another point to consider, what is a true 20C pack? I see many graphs of a 2200mah 20C pack that doesn't hold 2200mah at the said discharge rate. The mah of the pack is usually derived from a 1C discharge. What is the cutoff voltage of the test too? There are no clearly defined rules for the variables tested, and average voltage isn't given for the discharge rate either.

Well discharge capacity does depend on the discharge rate, that's no secret. Ie higher discharge = lower capacity. In all fairness, there are not any std rules in rating batt packs. Its kinda like cars and HP, up to a certain point you can prolly get away w/ saying anything, b/c test condits are so variable, & if you lowball it people w/ just buy the other guy's car.

Generally tho I've seen 3.5V/cell as the limit to discharge rate. IOW, a 2S1P 2.1AH 20C batt should hold 7V @ 42A continuously. If its doing 6.5V, its not 20C

The nice thing about MA is they do have std size lipos (44mm wide) and in a large range of caps. TRC's tend to be 50mm and don't fit in NIMH batt trays. They are much more affordable than FPs tho too.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
neweuser
RC Monster, the Final Frontier
 
neweuser's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,379
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
10.26.2007, 02:09 PM

Because I'm not a full blown racer, I happen to like my 4s and 5s MA packs. I get nice run times, and have not had any issues with them. I own 4s 8000, 5s 8000 and a 2100 for my rc18t, and love them all.

Of course, I have not tried the Flight Powers, which could be why. The reason is runtime. I cannot find a flight power pack that goes to 8000mah


"if you've got something to say, say it peacefully"
  Send a message via MSN to neweuser  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
BlackedOutREVO
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
10.26.2007, 08:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by neweuser View Post
Because I'm not a full blown racer, I happen to like my 4s and 5s MA packs. I get nice run times, and have not had any issues with them. I own 4s 8000, 5s 8000 and a 2100 for my rc18t, and love them all.

Of course, I have not tried the Flight Powers, which could be why. The reason is runtime. I cannot find a flight power pack that goes to 8000mah
A 5000 MAH 25C flight power pack would easily last as long as the 8k, or darn close

I also have to say, my flight power and TrakPower packs FLIPPING RULE!!!!!!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
BP-Revo
BMW M Power!
 
BP-Revo's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,910
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
10.27.2007, 11:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by neweuser View Post
Of course, I have not tried the Flight Powers, which could be why. The reason is runtime. I cannot find a flight power pack that goes to 8000mah
Sylvester used to run 4S 8000mah MaxAmps in his 1950 powered LSP. He since switched to 3700mah 4S 25C FlightPowers and only lost 10 minutes in runtime (30min down to 20). So, it seems that per amp-hour, the Maxamps packs provide 3.75 minutes, while the FlightPowers provide 5.4 minutes. Not only that, but he said the overall performance of the FlightPower packs was significantly better than the MaxAmps packs.

MaxAmps packs are pretty good packs, but their packs lack a lot of qualities that I switched to LiPo to obtain. For me, I see LiPo as a lightweight pack that can deliver high currents. With MaxAmps packs, it seems that you have to get an excessively large capacity pack in order to get a pack that can supply high currents. This, obviously, takes away from the lightweight quality. My FlightPower 4500mah Evo30's are rated to 135Amps continuous, and I truly believe that they are capable of providing that kind of current. The MaxAmps 8000's I previously had were rated to 160Amps if they were true to 20C. Most people say they are close to a 15C pack. Even if I was generous and gave 17C, the pack falls to 136Amps, nearly identical to the FlightPower Packs I currently use. However, the 8k's weigh 365g per pack, while the FlightPower packs weigh 252g per pack. Between two packs, thats over a 200g loss in weight. (Each of the packs I referred to, be it MaxAmps or FlightPower, were those of 2S configuration).

I'm not trying to bag on MaxAmps or anything, but they just aren't cost efficient (i.e., they are priced a bit too high if you ask me). Each of my FlightPower packs costs me $125 from Tower. Tower currently has a spend $149, get $20 off promotion going on. Not only that, but since I'm a member of their Super Saver's Club or whatever, I get free shipping on orders over $150. Therefore, I add, say, a Novak Smart Stop, and my order reaches $150, and then drops to $130 as a result of the promotion.

With MaxAmps, a 8000mah pack costs $155 (not including the cost of adding a plug and other stuff), plus ~$7-10 shipping. Thats ~$165, and all you get is a pack. On the Tower order, it costs ~$130 and you get a pack and a corresponding voltage cutoff for it.

Now, if you are concerned about runtime. Take 8 x 3.75 and get 30 minutes. Take 4.5 x 5.4 and get ~25 minutes.

Thats my personal view of it. I'm running a top of the line motor, why not buy top of the line batteries? Specially when they are cheaper.


BL Revo: CF G2R, LMT1940/7, 6S FP 30C Lipos, MMM, Hitec 5955TG
CRT .5: 7075 Ext Chassis, LMT1930/7, FP 25C 3S Lipos, MM
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
johnrobholmes
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
johnrobholmes's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 905
Join Date: Aug 2007
10.26.2007, 04:31 PM

Now there is the Elite brand too, they fit in battery trays.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
AAngel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
10.26.2007, 07:36 PM

I have in the past destroyed a number of the 6Ah packs under conditions that they should have been ok in. I like the maxamps packs overall because of the bang for the buck factor, but when compared to other "better" packs, they don't stand up.

I recently had a short lived interest in parking lot drag racing and I could really see (according to our Bushnell radar gun) a difference when switching from a 5S 5Ah maxamps pack to a Neu 4900 (I think it is) 5S pack. The difference was worth a couple to a few mph over 132 feet of running. To me, that's substantial.

Lately, I've found myself going with the Neu and Flightpower packs for applications that need them and the truerc packs for applications that don't require so much battery.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
10.27.2007, 05:20 PM

I've seen various discharge graphs of these 6k packs, and they simple are not up the task. Surprised to hear this story is still continues for this particular cells. Contact Austin about this; he will do anything to keep the customer happy.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Mightytaco
RC-Monster Stock
 
Offline
Posts: 48
Join Date: Apr 2007
10.27.2007, 09:32 PM

Thanks for the replies guys. Before i had the logger i was wondering if i was hitting the amperage "fuse" of the mgm controller. Here is part of one of my test runs a few days ago.

Graph
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com