RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
AAngel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
09.24.2007, 11:51 PM

When you gear up, it will draw more current. Going to 5S A123 with the MM shouldn't be a problem. I can't remember if I did it or not. I ran 5S A123 in my 8ight T, but can't remember if I used a MM or Monster Pro.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
ClodMaxx
hold my beer... watch this...
 
ClodMaxx's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 969
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: berkley, michigan
09.25.2007, 03:08 PM

well i called a123 to see if i could change my order (didn't have confirmation that it had shipped yet) to take one of the 2s2p packs out and replace it with 2 of the 3s1p packs, but alas - they were too quick. it was shipped already. so for the time being, i'll be running 4s instead of 5s.

so, i do plan to go up to 5s2p with the a123 cells...which is still only 16.5v. it's going to be on the heavy side...10 cells total, but i'm fine with that.

my question is this: can anyone see a downside to building a deans parallel connector to connect 2 packs that are 3s1p on one side? i would think it would be fine, just wanted to make sure. i could also tear a dewalt pack apart and build a 3s2p single pack, but i hate soldering. i'm ok at it, but i hate it.


Xray XT8 (Neu powered) MMM on 5s
MD 500 scale heli - castle HV-45 on 3s
Eflite Blade 400 heli on 3s
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
09.25.2007, 03:22 PM

Deans parallel connectors are fine, I use my homemade one alot and it does not get hot, so I figure that it is ok. From what I have read the deans are only good for a 60 amp draw, but that must be continous, not sure what a 60 amp continuous sytem would look like, but it would be powerful!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
VintageMA
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
VintageMA's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 660
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
09.25.2007, 05:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClodMaxx View Post
well i called a123 to see if i could change my order (didn't have confirmation that it had shipped yet) to take one of the 2s2p packs out and replace it with 2 of the 3s1p packs, but alas - they were too quick. it was shipped already. so for the time being, i'll be running 4s instead of 5s.

so, i do plan to go up to 5s2p with the a123 cells...which is still only 16.5v. it's going to be on the heavy side...10 cells total, but i'm fine with that.

my question is this: can anyone see a downside to building a deans parallel connector to connect 2 packs that are 3s1p on one side? i would think it would be fine, just wanted to make sure. i could also tear a dewalt pack apart and build a 3s2p single pack, but i hate soldering. i'm ok at it, but i hate it.
Just from my experience (which was very short lived for now) with the A123 cells, they don't hold their rated voltage under load. Granted I was using a 1P setup which didn't hold it's voltage as well as the 2P systems will, but check out the specs on a 2S2P pack here: http://www.a123racing.com/SpecSheets...te_14Aug06.pdf You will be getting about 6 volts on 2S2P @ 23Amps. @ 69Amps you are only talking 5 volts (2.5v per cell)

The packs are very heavy and very bulky. I went with the 2 of the 2S1p packs in hopes of using it in a CRT.5 project @ 13.2v. After running that and comparing it with my 3S 5000mAh Maxamps lipo packs I have to say that I am much happier with the lipo packs. The lipo pack is smaller in size than the 4S1P A123, holds more than 2X the charge and is lighter as well. The A123 cells do have a great punch, but due to the low storage capacity they seemed to dump pretty quickly.

I've never had a problem with lipo when using a decent brand (Maxamps, TP, Kokam/Orion, or TrakPower/FlightPower) so I think I will stick with them until the A123 technology matures over the next few years (which I am sure it will and am definitely looking forward to). IMO the power density (even when compared to NiMH) is too low making for a heavy pack and the cells are too cumbersome for easy placement.


“Everyone has a right to be stupid; some people just abuse the privilege.”
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
ClodMaxx
hold my beer... watch this...
 
ClodMaxx's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 969
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: berkley, michigan
09.25.2007, 07:10 PM

i could give the list of reasons why i chose the a123 packs instead of lipo, but i'd rather this thread not turn into a lipo vs. a123 debate.

i'll find out about the a123 performance soon enough. i appreciate your input.


Xray XT8 (Neu powered) MMM on 5s
MD 500 scale heli - castle HV-45 on 3s
Eflite Blade 400 heli on 3s
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.25.2007, 07:59 PM

http://picasaweb.google.com/SethHulsebosch/RCPhotos

Check out the Eagletree graphs at the top of the page there.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
VintageMA
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
VintageMA's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 660
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
09.25.2007, 11:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClodMaxx View Post
i could give the list of reasons why i chose the a123 packs instead of lipo, but i'd rather this thread not turn into a lipo vs. a123 debate.

i'll find out about the a123 performance soon enough. i appreciate your input.
I have no intent in aiming on starting a debate on A123 vs lipo - cause that could be never ending.

Simply - I tried them and they are not for me right now.

I think in the 2P configuration in which you are going they will be much better than the 1P config I used - that will put them closer to that 5000mAh mark whichgives a nice blend of power to the motor and a decent amount of runtime.

If you are able to fit the batteries comfortably into your setup and they work for you - then I see no reason to bash them. They really do have their positive sides - the fast charge time, the safety factor, and the 1000+ rated cycles vs. about 200 or so cycles for a lipo.

It is definitely a battery technology that I will monitor closely and see how it progresses over the next few years. Once it matures to the next level - I could see it easily take the place of lipos in the car/buggy arena.


“Everyone has a right to be stupid; some people just abuse the privilege.”
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
09.25.2007, 07:55 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by VintageMA View Post
Just from my experience (which was very short lived for now) with the A123 cells, they don't hold their rated voltage under load. Granted I was using a 1P setup which didn't hold it's voltage as well as the 2P systems will, but check out the specs on a 2S2P pack here: http://www.a123racing.com/SpecSheets...te_14Aug06.pdf You will be getting about 6 volts on 2S2P @ 23Amps. @ 69Amps you are only talking 5 volts (2.5v per cell)

The packs are very heavy and very bulky. I went with the 2 of the 2S1p packs in hopes of using it in a CRT.5 project @ 13.2v. After running that and comparing it with my 3S 5000mAh Maxamps lipo packs I have to say that I am much happier with the lipo packs. The lipo pack is smaller in size than the 4S1P A123, holds more than 2X the charge and is lighter as well. The A123 cells do have a great punch, but due to the low storage capacity they seemed to dump pretty quickly.

I've never had a problem with lipo when using a decent brand (Maxamps, TP, Kokam/Orion, or TrakPower/FlightPower) so I think I will stick with them until the A123 technology matures over the next few years (which I am sure it will and am definitely looking forward to). IMO the power density (even when compared to NiMH) is too low making for a heavy pack and the cells are too cumbersome for easy placement.
I had similar results as you with did running my lightning staduim 10 on 4s1p a123. I actually found that running 3s2p gave me better acceleration and better top end witha little gearing adjustment. I'm carrying 2 extra cells around now, but they perform much better.

BTW someone mentioned a 1940/7 drawing to many amps for the a123 eariler, but I actuially think that it would be fine. I run a 1940/7 in my savage with 5s2p a123 and it rubns great. Because I didnt need a LVC with the a123 I was able to use an older style BK controller I had around. If you run a123 the 9920 and 12020 become very atractive options again.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly


   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
09.25.2007, 08:03 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhautz View Post

BTW someone mentioned a 1940/7 drawing to many amps for the a123 eariler, but I actuially think that it would be fine. I run a 1940/7 in my savage with 5s2p a123 and it rubns great. Because I didnt need a LVC with the a123 I was able to use an older style BK controller I had around. If you run a123 the 9920 and 12020 become very atractive options again.
I agree, when I ran 5s2p on a 7XL, it had awesome power, able to flip over the truck at any speed with WOT. I had it geared for 45+mph, and I think it could actually hit 50mph because of the tire ballooning on the badlands.


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com