RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
t-maxxracer32
RC-Monster Brushless
 
t-maxxracer32's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,184
Join Date: Nov 2006
10.29.2007, 11:25 AM

well i have some 645mg servos that i could use for brakes and that will allow me to save some money!

also, i too was wondering why i needed that 375 dollar esc but i figured it was needed with such a big truck...

i have a question.

if i get the 1y and use 4s on it how will that compare to the 2.5d on 5s?

i will never go 6s but possibly 5s.

what would you think the runtimes would be with the 30c 4500 batteries?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Patrick
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 862
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
10.29.2007, 11:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mailman View Post
The XT8 mount is the first one that allows you to use mechanical brakes.
Oh, sounds good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by t-maxxracer32 View Post
also, i too was wondering why i needed that 375 dollar esc but i figured it was needed with such a big truck...
Last week when I raced my truggy (5 or 6 5 minute races in the middle of warm day) my unmoded quark was working well with just the rcm heatsink and no fans, running the 1515 2.5D (1700kv) on 5s, so I would have thought that the 16018 would work well too since people say the MGM's run cooler, but tallyram's truggy that was linked to uses 22418 ($375 one), so maybe there's something I don't know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by t-maxxracer32 View Post
if i get the 1y and use 4s on it how will that compare to the 2.5d on 5s?
I don't have both to compare, but on those voltages the 2.5d should only be ~1000rpm slower, so top speed with the same gearing should very close, but with the higher voltage the 2.5D should have a bit more torque and lower amp draw. Meaning a little bit less volt drop in theory, which could make up the rpm difference and there should be a bit more room to gear up. Basically I think they should be pretty close, but the 2.5 should run a little bit cooler, with a bit more torque and runtime.

Last edited by Patrick; 10.29.2007 at 11:23 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com