RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old
  (#10)
pinkpanda3310
RC-Monster Titanium
 
pinkpanda3310's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,152
Join Date: Sep 2008
08.28.2009, 08:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
Yesp, not worth what you get IMO. There are ultimately three ways to deal with heat:

1: More efficient components.

2: Less current.

3: Heatsink with thermal mass and surface area.

Everything else is just adding complexity.

I have two Quark 125's that use the top plate (connecting the three diffs) as a heatsink and it works wonderfully without the need for any additional active cooling. The chassis is another good heatsink and gets lots of airflow. I just wish more ESCs were built similar to the Quarks in how the FETs are mounted...
So if the extra power consumption wasn't a big issue then the quark would be one of the better esc's to try this on, right? Mount the plate between the esc and chassis. Like you said, it just transfers the heat and the chassis has thermal mass with lots of surface area and lots of air flow.

I can't see it benefiting other esc's like the mmm, rx8, hw150...etc without having to modify the casing.

But if you do work something out, we'll need to see pics
   
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com