Nice! Thank you. I just spent some time on the Castle site reading about those motors. Your right I can't beat that price.
If I were to stay with 4s can you tell me what the difference would be between the 1518 / 1520 / 1717? I'm guessing the 1518 you suggested would be a little faster because it has the highest Kv rating. I'm also guessing the other 2 motors would shine better with 5s or 6s?
Am I in the ball park? The 1717 is also physically larger so I wonder what effect that has?
On 4S? I'd go with a 1515 which is effectively what the Flux runs. A 1520 or 1717 you'd really have to gear up to get speed out of them on 4S. 1518 is probably a compromise as it requires less gearing but it is still closer to the 1520/1717 than the 1515. Run the numbers though Script Asylum's rc calc (http://scriptasylum.com/rc_speed/_top_speed.html) and see what the rough numbers come out too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RC-NUT
Nice! Thank you. I just spent some time on the Castle site reading about those motors. Your right I can't beat that price.
If I were to stay with 4s can you tell me what the difference would be between the 1518 / 1520 / 1717? I'm guessing the 1518 you suggested would be a little faster because it has the highest Kv rating. I'm also guessing the other 2 motors would shine better with 5s or 6s?
Am I in the ball park? The 1717 is also physically larger so I wonder what effect that has?
Kershaw Designs is blowing out the 1717 for $179.00!!
I guess I can't argue with Castle for $70.00.
I have a feeling that speed calculator is not accurate for the simple fact I don't have the final gear radio of the KD direct drive tranny. They give the final ratios with a pinion and spur but not the tranny alone.
Thanks for the help guys. After browsing the forum for a while I've decided to go with the 1518. I really like the 1717 due to it's size but from what I have read it's a power hungry motor. My 2s 35C 3800 packs probably won't do it.
Worst case I'll buy both but I'll most likely go with the 1518. I can always bump the voltage in the future.