RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > General Electric

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old
  (#31)
big greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
05.29.2009, 12:42 AM

i would just use the 2000 kv and turn your epa on your radio down for 6s, this is like changing the pinion, it just controls the motor rpm back to what it was running on 4s, so really its like gearing down 3 teeth
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#32)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
05.29.2009, 12:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by superek4 View Post
should start with my 6s 5000 on 1600kv or 2000kv on 35mph?
I would run the 1600kv motor on 6s geared for 35. I think it will give you the best result.

Quote:
Originally Posted by big greg View Post
i would just use the 2000 kv and turn your epa on your radio down for 6s, this is like changing the pinion, it just controls the motor rpm back to what it was running on 4s, so really its like gearing down 3 teeth
You need to write a guide on how to lower your efficiency dude. Dropping the epa will only heat the esc up more, and is a poor substitute for a properly setup system.

I am guessing (since I do not race) that you benefit from having a faster truck for qualifying in order to get a better placement for the main? I am also guessing the qual is shorter than the main? Yet another quaint but pointless method to determine the starting grid, IMO. Race officials should not allow gearing or setup changes for the qual to the main, IMO. Get racing back to skill, not equipment... Probably why I do not race...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#33)
big greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
05.29.2009, 01:20 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by lincpimp View Post
I would run the 1600kv motor on 6s geared for 35. I think it will give you the best result.



You need to write a guide on how to lower your efficiency dude. Dropping the epa will only heat the esc up more, and is a poor substitute for a properly setup system.

I am guessing (since I do not race) that you benefit from having a faster truck for qualifying in order to get a better placement for the main? I am also guessing the qual is shorter than the main? Yet another quaint but pointless method to determine the starting grid, IMO. Race officials should not allow gearing or setup changes for the qual to the main, IMO. Get racing back to skill, not equipment... Probably why I do not race...
i have never noticed the mmm getting any warmer dropping the epa, ive heard that about old speedos but dont agree with it on the mambas, ive heard multiple others say the same thing but never noticed this among me and a dozen or so others around here doing it
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#34)
lincpimp
Check out my huge box!
 
lincpimp's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 11,935
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slidell, LA
05.29.2009, 01:27 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by big greg View Post
i have never noticed the mmm getting any warmer dropping the epa, ive heard that about old speedos but dont agree with it on the mambas, ive heard multiple others say the same thing but never noticed this among me and a dozen or so others around here doing it
Ok, at anything less than full throttle the esc has to switch the fets to chop the voltage down. That is what warms up escs, and that chopping has a by product of heat. No way to get around that. And making heat means that you are losing runtime...
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#35)
littlegiant
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 165
Join Date: Mar 2009
05.29.2009, 03:34 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by big greg View Post
i have never noticed the mmm getting any warmer dropping the epa, ive heard that about old speedos but dont agree with it on the mambas, ive heard multiple others say the same thing but never noticed this among me and a dozen or so others around here doing it
Dropping EPA is a method of limiting the power of the motor but there is this concern that it may lower efficiency in the motor or esc. To my understanding, the motor will not be affected much as long as it is running within its optimum rpm range - where there is no significant predominately iron or copper loss.

As for the esc, switching loss of the mosfets is the main cause of concern when lowering the EPA. According to my findings, other than switching to rotate the magnetic field within a brushless motor, the esc varies the input power to the motor by doing pwm switching when powering each phase of the motor coils. Usually pwm is done at a constant frequency - only the duty cycle is varied. But at 100% duty cycle, the mosfets are turned on all the time. Anyway, a well designed esc will operate its mosfet at an efficient pwm frequencies while maintaining good performance. And to top it off, with advancement in mosfet technology, good quality mosfets can switch at high frequency with minimum switching loss as long as the switching current is of an acceptable range. Switching loss goes up as switching frequency goes up/switching current goes up. Switching loss due to gate capacitence is neligible at constant on or off state but becomes significant when switching at high frequency. This explains why mosfets heat up more when running at a lower than 100% duty cycle. At 100% duty cycle, the mosfets are still switching to rotate the magnetic field of the motor around the rotor but the switching frequency of the mosfets is reduced.

I doubt that there will a big difference in esc temp by lowering the EPA in todays well designed escs with quality mosfets. Many reported that running their brushless setups at half throttle seems to heat up the motor/esc more.
I am thinking that maybe there is lesser air flow (lower speed) or that the motor's efficiency is lowered due to it running at a lower than optimum RPM (copper loss). But then again, I highly doubt that the temperature increase will be a lot. Probably just 1 or 2C depending on the setup. I will test out different EPA values once I get my HW150A.

Slap me hard if I got it wrong. :D

Last edited by littlegiant; 05.29.2009 at 07:48 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#36)
superek4
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
superek4's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 832
Join Date: Jan 2009
05.29.2009, 04:25 AM

I use heats as practise rather than push d car to it max becoz in main it's more endurance than quick dash.

The setup is heavier n safer driving, always stay away from crowds

Quote:
Originally Posted by lincpimp View Post
I would run the 1600kv motor on 6s geared for 35. I think it will give you the best result.



You need to write a guide on how to lower your efficiency dude. Dropping the epa will only heat the esc up more, and is a poor substitute for a properly setup system.

I am guessing (since I do not race) that you benefit from having a faster truck for qualifying in order to get a better placement for the main? I am also guessing the qual is shorter than the main? Yet another quaint but pointless method to determine the starting grid, IMO. Race officials should not allow gearing or setup changes for the qual to the main, IMO. Get racing back to skill, not equipment... Probably why I do not race...


My Sponsors
Hobbywing
ManiaRc
Acorn racing
UpgradeRc
Blackbeard RC
Team Hong Nor
Team RC Monster
MoosRacing
BocaBearings
SweepRacing
Tresrey USA
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#37)
superek4
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
superek4's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 832
Join Date: Jan 2009
05.29.2009, 04:27 AM

Wats the safe cut off for racing? 3v per cell or 3.2


My Sponsors
Hobbywing
ManiaRc
Acorn racing
UpgradeRc
Blackbeard RC
Team Hong Nor
Team RC Monster
MoosRacing
BocaBearings
SweepRacing
Tresrey USA
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#38)
littlegiant
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 165
Join Date: Mar 2009
05.29.2009, 05:18 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by superek4 View Post
Wats the safe cut off for racing? 3v per cell or 3.2
Low current application, 3V.

High current application 3.2 - 3.5V to be safe. For your case I think 3.2V will suffice.

I've been setting the LVC to 3V for all my lipos be it they are used in 1/36 or 1/10. So far no damage. My 1/10 e-savage (modded) is geared for 40 over mph.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#39)
superek4
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
superek4's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 832
Join Date: Jan 2009
05.29.2009, 08:09 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlegiant View Post
Low current application, 3V.

High current application 3.2 - 3.5V to be safe. For your case I think 3.2V will suffice.

I've been setting the LVC to 3V for all my lipos be it they are used in 1/36 or 1/10. So far no damage. My 1/10 e-savage (modded) is geared for 40 over mph.
thx man, so how's ur car going to any race?


My Sponsors
Hobbywing
ManiaRc
Acorn racing
UpgradeRc
Blackbeard RC
Team Hong Nor
Team RC Monster
MoosRacing
BocaBearings
SweepRacing
Tresrey USA
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#40)
big greg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
05.29.2009, 10:08 AM

that was a good write up, as for it dropping efficiency, your not wot barely at any tracks i run on, so i dont think it will do much difference
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#41)
littlegiant
RC-Monster Carbon Fiber
 
Offline
Posts: 165
Join Date: Mar 2009
05.29.2009, 11:36 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by superek4 View Post
thx man, so how's ur car going to any race?
Race?

LOL I am still a student. No $$$ to get spare battery packs. Only have a set of batteries.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#42)
jzemaxx
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 944
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: huntsville, AL
05.29.2009, 12:29 PM

With 6S why not lower the throttle curve in the MMM settings. Leave EPA at 100% though. Not sure how it effects temps and efficiency but I figure its there for a reason.

Also- 6S 5000 = 111W, 4S 8000 = 118.4 watts. So the 4S with the right gearing would have a runtime in theory of 6.25% more then the 6S setup.


Serpent S811-E Tekin
Revo 3.3 BL- 1515 1Y
Mugen MBX6 NEU/MMM
Mugen MBX6-T NEU/MMM
Losi LST2.0 MT NEU/MMM
Losi 8T RTR 2.0 NEU/MMM
Losi 8T 2.0 NEU/MMM
Losi 8B-E 2.0 NEU/MMM
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#43)
superek4
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
superek4's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 832
Join Date: Jan 2009
05.29.2009, 01:14 PM

ok, i hv previous record of my last race i charged my batts n it ended at 3380, i estimated i hv ran for 20-21mins so izzit 3380/21mins? =161mah per min?

i had 12pinion at 50spur with 1600kv motor so what batts i need to do 30min?

izzit 161mah/per min x 30mins?= 4830mah i need to run a 30min race?

if i am going to run at 13pinion do i need more mah?


My Sponsors
Hobbywing
ManiaRc
Acorn racing
UpgradeRc
Blackbeard RC
Team Hong Nor
Team RC Monster
MoosRacing
BocaBearings
SweepRacing
Tresrey USA
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#44)
superek4
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
superek4's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 832
Join Date: Jan 2009
05.29.2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by littlegiant View Post
Race?

LOL I am still a student. No $$$ to get spare battery packs. Only have a set of batteries.

uni student? can afford to play e savage? not bad i used to play Nikko when i was student


My Sponsors
Hobbywing
ManiaRc
Acorn racing
UpgradeRc
Blackbeard RC
Team Hong Nor
Team RC Monster
MoosRacing
BocaBearings
SweepRacing
Tresrey USA
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#45)
nitrostarter
RC-Monster Brushless
 
nitrostarter's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,156
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gramercy, LA
05.29.2009, 01:24 PM

I'm a working, broke student that plays with multiple r/c's....


N. Rustler conversion
  Send a message via AIM to nitrostarter  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com