RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Team Tekin

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#16)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
07.03.2008, 08:09 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by speed demon View Post
Impressive. How does this compare to your MM's you mod? Are these better? If so...in what way? Again impressive work.
:) Hmm, nice question. They both nice and foot print is great.
From my viewpoint, before mods:
MM cons:
-Incorrect caps for above 4S (fixed with Mod)
-Poor heatsinking, especially first gen. pcb. (Improved with Mod)
-software handicap above 3S (LiPo cutoff can be sacrificed to make it operational)
-poor enclosure design, come loose very quick, i.e. improper for ESC mounting. (Not addressed yet)
MM pros:
-great foot print
-nice programming via USB
-very smooth with latest firmware
-30 fet's total with 24 top level, i.e. with heatsink
Tekin cons:
-no built in Caps, but cap provided, below 4S operation (Modded one allows 6S operation)
- poor heatsinking, heatsink missing (Improved dramatically with heatsink)
Tekin pros:
-very nice foot print
-great enclosure design
-native software support above 3-4S LiPo
-haven't checked Tekin's Hotwire interface, yet
-48 fet's total, none

Common cons and pros are omitted.

In theory Tekin ESC, having 48 fets (but dynamic losses come to play later), doesn't need heatsink for currents below 50A @ 4S LiPo maximum, but with proper heatsinking becoming very capable ESC with smallest foot print.
While MM in stock form can be good for similar performance, while with the mod1 can get close to current capacity of Modified Tekin R1Pro.
Both have Linear BEC's, so both need UBEC (or separate receiver pack) above 3S LiPo, meaning red wire need to be pulled out and isolated.

Price wise MM is the winner, but which one is better? I am not sure, I like them both.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
magman
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
magman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
07.03.2008, 08:51 AM

Thanks Artur for the info and all of your hard work in giving us lucky folk the ability to put an even bigger smile on our faces...


1. MBX-6 T8 1900KV, RX8 ON 4S
2. MBX-5T 1520, MMM ON 5S
3. MBX-5 ONROAD CONVERSION 1515, MMM ON 5S
4. MRX-3 ON ROAD CONVERSION 1512, MMM ON 6S
5. TEN T 2650 T8, MMP ON 3S

Last edited by magman; 07.03.2008 at 08:52 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
07.03.2008, 09:18 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffinRU View Post
:) Hmm, nice question. They both nice and foot print is great.
From my viewpoint, before mods:
MM cons:
-Incorrect caps for above 4S (fixed with Mod)
-Poor heatsinking, especially first gen. pcb. (Improved with Mod)
-software handicap above 3S (LiPo cutoff can be sacrificed to make it operational)
-poor enclosure design, come loose very quick, i.e. improper for ESC mounting. (Not addressed yet)
MM pros:
-great foot print
-nice programming via USB
-very smooth with latest firmware
-30 fet's total with 24 top level, i.e. with heatsink
Tekin cons:
-no built in Caps, but cap provided, below 4S operation (Modded one allows 6S operation)
- poor heatsinking, heatsink missing (Improved dramatically with heatsink)
Tekin pros:
-very nice foot print
-great enclosure design
-native software support above 3-4S LiPo
-haven't checked Tekin's Hotwire interface, yet
-48 fet's total, none

Common cons and pros are omitted.

In theory Tekin ESC, having 48 fets (but dynamic losses come to play later), doesn't need heatsink for currents below 50A @ 4S LiPo maximum, but with proper heatsinking becoming very capable ESC with smallest foot print.
While MM in stock form can be good for similar performance, while with the mod1 can get close to current capacity of Modified Tekin R1Pro.
Both have Linear BEC's, so both need UBEC (or separate receiver pack) above 3S LiPo, meaning red wire need to be pulled out and isolated.

Price wise MM is the winner, but which one is better? I am not sure, I like them both.
Great list Artur. Just to add some to your hotwire comment. If the MM software and USM programing is great, then the Tekin is very good. Still an excelent piece of software with great programing capabilities, ut missing a couple key things vs te MM. 1st- the thottle curve progaming on the MM and MM are 2nd to none. The Tekin allows changes to a few preset curves, the MM has infinite adjustment. 2nd- WHile I actually hate the usb jack in the side of the esc and would prefer the Rx cble programaing like the MMM and R1Pro, the software on the MM is just simpler and easier to understand than the Tekin software.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly


   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
07.03.2008, 10:05 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhautz View Post
Great list Artur. Just to add some to your hotwire comment. If the MM software and USM programing is great, then the Tekin is very good. Still an excelent piece of software with great programing capabilities, ut missing a couple key things vs te MM. 1st- the thottle curve progaming on the MM and MM are 2nd to none. The Tekin allows changes to a few preset curves, the MM has infinite adjustment. 2nd- WHile I actually hate the usb jack in the side of the esc and would prefer the Rx cble programaing like the MMM and R1Pro, the software on the MM is just simpler and easier to understand than the Tekin software.
Thank you for update, Jeff.

Hey, you drove Tekin R1Pro hard...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	jeffsTekin.jpg
Views:	563
Size:	70.5 KB
ID:	4922  
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
magman
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
magman's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
07.03.2008, 10:10 PM

I'd say...looks like he had some fun tho...


1. MBX-6 T8 1900KV, RX8 ON 4S
2. MBX-5T 1520, MMM ON 5S
3. MBX-5 ONROAD CONVERSION 1515, MMM ON 5S
4. MRX-3 ON ROAD CONVERSION 1512, MMM ON 6S
5. TEN T 2650 T8, MMP ON 3S
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#21)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
07.04.2008, 01:21 AM

Actually... I had the capacitor lead break on me and didnt realize it. The esc overheated pretty darn fast runnnig without a cap. But... to the little guys credit, as soon as I put a new cap on it it was running good as new. This time I put a short section of flexible wire beween the cap and the sloder posts. The rigid wire on the cap must have broke from the vibratrion. I had it tied down, but it must not have been enough to prevent a little flex in the wires and it allowed them to fracture over time.

Other than that, it actually ran fairly cool on the meduim to mild setup that I run for the track. I did notice the plastic case got a bit warped after the capacitor incident. It does look rather wonky in the picture. lol


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly



Last edited by jhautz; 07.04.2008 at 01:23 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#22)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
07.05.2008, 08:34 PM

Hey Jeff,
Can I reset ESC to factory default for testing? It is blinking 1,3,5 LED on me, I am assuming custom voltage cut-off. I do not have hotwire at hand, it is coming from tower any day now, but I would like to finish your ESC and ship it tomorrow.


   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23)
TruckBasher
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
TruckBasher's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 554
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Singapore
07.05.2008, 09:21 PM

Looks like a pro job to me...

If I had the money i would have bought the one on sale...


Great job Artur


E-Slayer direct drive to diff
Savage Flux 5T work in progress
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#24)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
07.05.2008, 09:39 PM

Certainly. Set it however you want for testing. I'll set it with the hotwire before running it.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly


   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25)
Serum
RC-Monster Admin
 
Serum's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
07.06.2008, 04:26 AM

How far can the R1 pro controller be pushed? does it handle 5S?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#26)
jhautz
RC-Monster Mod
 
jhautz's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
07.06.2008, 07:25 AM

I ran it for months on 5s in its stock form. It takes it easily. I know that Jim from Tekin even said it would probably take 6s. It has 30v components inside. But I personally havent tested it. With Arturs mod to it its now limited to 5s becasue he used a 27v component on it. But 5s is plenty for me. In stock form it ran my buggy with 5s and a Hacker 10xl geared for 38-40 mph or so without even breaking a sweat on the track.


I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...


Silent...But Deadly


   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#27)
phatmonk
RC carbon junkie
 
phatmonk's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 634
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Iowa
07.06.2008, 08:32 AM

What is the Tekin R1 Pro's amperage rating?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#28)
GriffinRU
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Offline
Posts: 748
Join Date: Oct 2005
07.06.2008, 09:08 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serum View Post
How far can the R1 pro controller be pushed? does it handle 5S?
Far..., as long as software can handle it. Although I do not feel comfortable running close to FET's rated voltage.

Quote:
What is the Tekin R1 Pro's amperage rating?
Quote:
SPECS: Controls: Forward/Brake/Reverse
ON Resistance: 0.00005 Ohms (brushed fwd mode)
0.00015 Ohms (brushless mode)
0.00015 Ohms (brushed fwd/rev mode)
Input Voltage: 4 - 9 Cells, 2 - 3S Lipo
BEC 6.0 V / 3.0 A
Motor Limit: Brushed and Brushless, no limit
Throttle Profiles: 1-7
Max Current: Brushed Forward, 312amps / 624amps
Brushless per Phase: 104amps / 208amps
I will assume that stock ratings based on 26A per Fet @ 1sq-in pad with 1oz copper.

Modifications inside, extend current handling and power ratings, but do not overestimate pcb traces current capacity.

Last edited by GriffinRU; 07.06.2008 at 09:10 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#29)
phatmonk
RC carbon junkie
 
phatmonk's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 634
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Iowa
07.06.2008, 09:46 AM

Thanks for the quick response.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#30)
suicideneil
Old Skool
 
suicideneil's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 7,494
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Devon, England
07.07.2008, 06:29 PM

Hmm, looks like the upcomming MambaMaxPro will have some stiff competition. I wonder if castle would consider an aluminum case (of half case even) to aid strength and cooling some how (link it to the main heatsink on the FETS somehow)...
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com