 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
12.04.2006, 01:50 PM
I said 50mph, not 60mph.
Does other ppl 'experience' mean it's truth? Do you use eagletree to see how much power is used to GET THERE, or WHILE THERE? I'm sure these little motors pump out more than 750 watts together. I don't get what you are trying to say. Your not saying i'm lying are you.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
Last edited by zeropointbug; 12.04.2006 at 01:51 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
12.04.2006, 01:54 PM
No, i am not saying you are telling lies, i am just saying that the car must have had a calibrated speedo-meter..
i allready posted my results from my eagletree in another thread i posted in reaction to you yesterday. If you took time reading it, you would have known what the measurements where.
Not going to search for them, if you want to know, dig it up.
Last edited by Serum; 12.04.2006 at 01:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
12.04.2006, 01:57 PM
Yes, you are right Glass, it was with an XL3100. 12 cells brought him to 50 mph.
12 cells can do about 1200 watts, and his truck was very light. 1200 watts on a 93 percent efficient motor, that's 1116 watts. that's what is needed to get a light maxx to drive 50 mph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
12.04.2006, 02:10 PM
Well i think it's safe to say that it's not SO much the power as it is the motor handling the load for a certain amount of time... everyday bashing. I must add, i wouldnt be able to run on grass with this, hardly gravel as the motors got too hot, too hot to touch. The dual EVX were up high and right in the path of wind, i had no body on the thing.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC Monster, the Final Frontier
Offline
Posts: 3,379
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
12.04.2006, 05:32 PM
While we are at it, my maxx did 120 the other day! LOL
"if you've got something to say, say it peacefully"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
12.04.2006, 05:33 PM
I don't doubt you for a single second newe..
Was it still in one piece when it landed fromt he 7th floor?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Cult Member
Offline
Posts: 1,439
Join Date: Jun 2005
|
12.04.2006, 05:49 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHA! thats a easy way to get it going fast. I think i got bout 35-40 mph max. It was when i had a 9L with 16 cells. This was a while ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
12.04.2006, 06:03 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neweuser
While we are at it, my maxx did 120 the other day! LOL
|
What units is that figure in? MPH or KPH? :p
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC Monster, the Final Frontier
Offline
Posts: 3,379
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
|
12.04.2006, 06:06 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Serum
I don't doubt you for a single second newe..
Was it still in one piece when it landed fromt he 7th floor?
|
Nope, 120 pieces that is! LOL
"if you've got something to say, say it peacefully"
Last edited by neweuser; 12.04.2006 at 06:08 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
12.04.2006, 08:44 PM
Or was it 120ms to be destroyed? :017:
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 5,297
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SoCal
|
12.04.2006, 10:08 PM
My Rustler went 57.5mph GPS-verified. The setup was a Feigao 540 12s, MGM Compro 12012, 4s 5400mah 8C LiPo (the pack was constantly causing the LVC to kick in). The radio range at that time was terrible, maybe 150ft. in each direction (NOT enough for a good speed run).
SH Z-Car, Custom Crawler, 8s Savage, 12s XTM XLB 1/7 buggy, 4wd 4-link rear/IFS Pro4 truck, Custom Hyper 10 Short Course, Belt-Drive Mammoth ST 1/8 truggy, 4s 17.5 MM Pro HPI Blitz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Stock
Offline
Posts: 17
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
12.04.2006, 10:20 PM
Almost 60 with a rustler is great. I ran my T4 on 3s lipo with a lehner 3600XL geared 23/78 and was able to keep good pace with my buddy's jato 3.3. Of course I had to really feather the throttle to stop from launching my truck onto it's lid. I never got to get an official speed recorded because running that setup on 3s lipo is way too much for race conditions and my 3s packs are normally in another truck. Mike reccommended the motor to me and I have to say that it's great in the T4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 6,741
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: VA in the US
|
12.05.2006, 10:59 AM
What rene is saying to you zeropointbug.
Just because a motor is rated at 700 watts or even 1000 watts.
If you gear higher. Put more of a load on motor than what they are tested at.
You will get a higher wattage.
I have had a few fast trucks. I have no idea on speed. It was fast enough for me.
I would like to go faster though to. :D
Peace!
Country
Help support the
Rc-Monster
Buy here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
12.05.2006, 12:48 PM
That's exactly what i was trying to say, they could HANDLE the extra load. I may have been putting 1000 watts peak in it, but i know i wouldn't be getting much more power output at the shaft. 300 watts was tested on a little dyno, so thats what you are getting out the thing.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
12.05.2006, 12:56 PM
And the thing i was trying to explain that you can get 6000 watts of output power (at 94 percent efficiency. not input, but outputpower) from a 1950, which is rated for 1800 watts.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |