 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
04.30.2007, 10:34 PM
no comment.....
Yeah, that might be a problem, you don't want to go too big because of arcing like you said, your plugs might just become vapor after a while. :005:
Other option, what do you think about making a plug literally soldered right onto the board and poke out of the case? And have a cap bank on the battery end of things, right next to the deans, so almost no wire length between the caps and the case. But do you think caps should be on the other side of a plug?
BTW, i've tried to find solid polymer caps, but only made up to 16v. The only place I have seen them is a PC motherboards, video cards, some new sound cards. I don't want to run them in series either, IMO.
I wonder if ultra caps would help. Do you remember our thread back in Dec.? They would simply be for more power and take load off batts, but if used right, could they function as a power stage cap?
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
04.30.2007, 10:49 PM
One way to help with the arc is to use a light bulb between the last contact you make. Once the caps equalize, no more arc.
I'd keep the wire coming out of the ESC. If anything, use larger 10GA wire.
Yeah, putting caps in series will add their voltages, but halve the capacitance (assuming you are using two of the same values). Ultracaps might help, but are too big and heavy IMO. Not enough bang for the buck weight-wise. You have to keep the caps as close to the ESC as possible.
I would just add the caps to the PCB or the wires right before the ESC.
If you decide to get some caps, you usually can get a better price if you buy bulk. I would be interested in ten 220uf 35v caps. If we can get more people on this, it can be a group buy...
Last edited by BrianG; 04.30.2007 at 10:50 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
04.30.2007, 11:12 PM
ICIC
Where are you thinking we can get these caps? I can't remember what caps Quark uses, but I don't think they are the best, IMO. They should use three at least too.
What size are the ones in the Quark? 350uF? I can't remember.
Do you think it would be worth it doing a group buy, i'm just thinking of the shipping cost too... you know?
I wouldn't mind buying a whole lot of these either, like 50 or so, just to have for what ever. Low-ESR caps are fun when playing with pulse discharge.... brass washers.... wire coils.....:005: :005: Sounds like a gun shot when you short the coil out on a bank, and many disappearing coils. lol i was using 300 volts though.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 10,480
Join Date: Feb 2005
|
05.01.2007, 01:40 AM
Guys like you are the reason why the guarantee rules get tighter and tighter.. No need to explain this, i think?
You 'modified' it, you need to tell them honest what you did to it. as simple as that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
05.01.2007, 02:11 AM
Couple days ago I just bought 10 of the 220uf 35v caps that Brian recommended. The price was pretty cheap from Digi Key, only about 3-4 dollars for 10. The shipping and handling was was probably 2 times that though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
05.01.2007, 10:01 AM
Let us know how you used them and how they work. Pics are required of course. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
05.01.2007, 11:53 AM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zeropointbug
BTW, he said when I get it back, I should solder a couple good caps on the input leads for preventative maintenance. He said it should be done with large 1/10, 1/8 scale vehicles.
So I am going to find a source for these 'NICC' NRSH caps and use them. I like the looks of the 35v 330uF caps, maybe get 4 of them...?
|
Anyone got a recomendation for caps to use across the battery leads? Id like to do this mod. I feel like I push my Quarks pretty hard and anything I can do to help them I am interested in doing. Unfortunatley i'm kind of an electronincs dummy. I know capacitors basically just store a charge and release it when the overall system voltages drop to keep the votages as even as possible. How does adding more capacitiors help? Make it more resistant to voltage drop therfore drawing less amps by keeping the voltages higher?
Did S&T recomend a capacitior to use? A link to a place to purchase and any instalation instructions would be great.
I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...
Silent...But Deadly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
05.01.2007, 12:19 PM
Yes, adding caps will help supply a little extra current boost when the ESC pulls heavy current in bursts, but the capacitance value of those don't really provide much help there. They are there to help absorb the back-emf pulses, since they are really A/C pulses. So, they are used as storage to a small degree, but more like A/C filtering. Maybe GriffinRU can provide a little more insight since he seems to have more experience with ESC design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
05.01.2007, 12:22 PM
They are not really for voltage drop, they are for power conditioning and noise/spikes absorption. They take a crap load of abuse, obviously, and more of them spreads the load between each of them. They also provide more of a pulse when switching.
We should figure a good value for the capacity and use that, too much capacity, to much arcing will occur when plugging in batts.
About 'no comment', all I said was the cap had blown, I looked in, saw it... I mentioned I had a plate adhered to the case. He just kept telling me to send it in and they would replace it, he obviously didn't care, then he was talking to some guy in Switzerland? Who could that be? :005:
But yah, I'm thinking either 4 220, or 330uF caps right in next to the Quark input. I'll let you know what I decide
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
05.01.2007, 12:40 PM
IIRC, the Quark has two 330uF 35v caps. Adding 2 more 330uF caps would bring the total capacitance up to 1320uF. Better yet, use three 220uF caps - same overall value but should handle the current better and the increased overall surface area will help with heat. It might be difficult to add three more caps close to the input and still have short leads and not look like crap. Two should be fairly easy though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
05.01.2007, 12:54 PM
yah, 2 330's sound pretty good. Also, what do you think if one made a little cap bank of say 4-6 caps of 330 and made another input in the case right next to the batt input, and had the bank protected by shrink wrap? It would sit right up to the Quark, either they lay down on side, or 4 standing up in a square bank, do you know what I mean?
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
05.01.2007, 12:56 PM
what does IIRC mean?
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
05.01.2007, 01:31 PM
Yeah, a little "bank" should work ok. Just keep in mind that the more capacitance you add the more arcing on battery hookup.
IIRC=If I Remember Correctly. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
05.01.2007, 07:05 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jhautz
Anyone got a recomendation for caps to use across the battery leads? Id like to do this mod. I feel like I push my Quarks pretty hard and anything I can do to help them I am interested in doing. Unfortunatley i'm kind of an electronincs dummy. I know capacitors basically just store a charge and release it when the overall system voltages drop to keep the votages as even as possible. How does adding more capacitiors help? Make it more resistant to voltage drop therfore drawing less amps by keeping the voltages higher?
Did S&T recomend a capacitior to use? A link to a place to purchase and any instalation instructions would be great.
|
Oh sorry didn't reply to you. The capacitor they recommend, sort of (easily available somewhat) is the Novak power capacitors. Just so they can say hey, here, this is the one we use, they work.... know what I mean.
Here is a LINK
They look good to me, should work great for the Quark, having 2 680uF caps.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
05.01.2007, 07:22 PM
Forget that, that is the wrong capacitor for this, it's only 16v caps. They just mentioned Novak caps, so I searched it. But I can't seem to find 35v Novak ones, they seem to only have 25v caps, I don't think thats enough IMO.
I'll find something.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |