RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Turnigy Cam HK52 Super Test
Old
  (#1)
redshift
RC-Monster Square Tube
 
redshift's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,367
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CNY
Turnigy Cam HK52 Super Test - 10.19.2009, 08:01 PM

I spotted this one, had to try it out- http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/s...dproduct=10093

Metallover gave me a heads up on this as well, thanks Riley...

First impression, looks pretty well made actually. I had issues initially with copying through WMP, but it was no fault of the camera. Saturday was the only day I had to give it a little wringing, I did four separate tests, one on my old Honda, some aerial with my bro piloting, a ground test, and one on my truck.

Things I like:
- looks well made, considering the $40 price, and looks like it will take abuse
- small and light, HK has it at 1 ounce/28g but it's more like 2oz I think
- simple functions (especially compared to the FlyCamOne2)
- 2 batteries included (most cams this size do not have removeable batts)
- has some good accessories/attachments
- takes 2 to 16G micro SD cards
- decent exposure control, (not great, but better than most) so not bad on dark to light transition
- charges with USB, also with a USB wall charger
- real 30 frames-per-second (as advertised)

Things I don't like:
- timestamp, unneccessary and somewhat obtrusive, and it's 2007?
(someone may be able to mess with root files and delete, it's been done with a few different spy-sized cams, 2007 is better than 1980, that's what year my "gumstick cam" thinks it is...)
- the mic is right where you put your finger when using it handheld
- the product shot shows a manual and a mini CD-ROM, I got neither (had to beg and plead with some RCG members to post a PDF, and just what you'd expect, horrible Engrish)
- sharpness seems a bit much, detracts from resolution

I gave it a 7.5, but for onboard use, a 10 would be near impossible. A 10 would be about what the average mid-priced regular handheld camcorder would do under the same conditions. That's what I based the score on.

I did a WMV download to eliminate a second format conversion, so you can see what it really looks like.

Link: http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?y2tmjz2oqnw
   
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com