Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdelcast
Just for everyone's benefit--
The ICE datalogger (used in the XL/XL2) actually samples the current several times during each PWM cycle (synchronously), and then keeps a running average of the results. The samples are then written to flash memory at the programmed "sample rate."
So the sample rate is only the rate at which the averaged samples are written to memory -- not the rate at which the controller samples the current...
Make sense??
|
Ok, so my readings at 2/second are probably fairly accurate? And I am not missing any huge amounts of data by not using the 5/second setting? Yes/No? Hmmm, interesting. Is their much benefit to having the data written 5/second as opposed to 2/second since it is averaged? thanks Patrick.