RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
ssspconcepts
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
ssspconcepts's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 834
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aubrey, Texas
05.16.2007, 07:46 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by A4DTM
zero, I hope you don't mind, I got bored and played w/ your design some. thoughts?




I'm sold. Put it into production and I'll buy it.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
05.16.2007, 11:51 AM

SSSPCONCEPTS:

Would you rather have the flat bottom, so you can use RC-Monster heatsink/mount.

Would you rather have integral heatsink on bottom w/ mount screw holes on each end of case?


Also: Does anyone know the dimensions of the RC-Monster heatsink, the length?

Thanks


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens

Last edited by zeropointbug; 05.16.2007 at 11:55 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Patrick
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 862
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
05.17.2007, 06:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeropointbug
Also: Does anyone know the dimensions of the RC-Monster heatsink, the length?

Thanks
Mine is 84mm long.....the heatsink, you dirty minded people.

That design is looking pretty good, if it has a flat bottom then it would be good for mounting to the chassis of a 1/8th, but then if it had fins on the bottom and mounting holes on the end there would be one less thing for an e-maxx driver to buy. Personally I have the RC-Monster heatsink already, and I have a 1/8th that I will want to put the Quark in soon, so I like the flat bottomed version with screw holes underneath.

Last edited by Patrick; 05.17.2007 at 06:07 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
05.17.2007, 11:22 AM

Geez, I was hearing that ppl would rather have integral heatsink on bottom? You will still be able to mount the bottom on anything, it is flat heatsink, no problem there.

I will see how much a heatsink bottom will cost, and one with flat bottom.

thanks Patrick


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
ssspconcepts
RC-Monster Aluminum
 
ssspconcepts's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 834
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aubrey, Texas
05.17.2007, 01:43 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeropointbug
SSSPCONCEPTS:

Would you rather have the flat bottom, so you can use RC-Monster heatsink/mount.

Would you rather have integral heatsink on bottom w/ mount screw holes on each end of case?


Also: Does anyone know the dimensions of the RC-Monster heatsink, the length?

Thanks
I like an integral design.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
zeropointbug
Z-Pinch racer
 
zeropointbug's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
05.17.2007, 08:05 PM

Yeah, me too. I think it's best keeping to one design, and integral is my middle name.

This is what an R/C MT esc should be with this heatsink, the Quark... even if S&T made the top set of FET's coupled to the chassis, that would be worlds better.

CAD program says the outside surface area is roughly 300cm2. That should do the trick. :017:

So maxxman, nieles, ssspconcepts, patrick, A4DTM, jhautz are you guys seriously interested in getting one for yourselves?

Again, the design is not to specs, I don't have my Quark back yet from S&T, so it's going to have to wait for it to get here.

Does anyone happen to know a free thermal simulator program that I could use on this case?

ZPB


“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens

Last edited by zeropointbug; 05.17.2007 at 08:16 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com