 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
(#1)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
12.02.2007, 01:12 PM
alright, i get what you said patrick but the other guys think the 1950 is better, i guess ill go with that if theres no other opinions.
|
   |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#2)
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 6,254
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baton Rouge
|
12.02.2007, 01:37 PM
Quote:
I personally would get the 2230. It will draw less amps, which with the airplane esc is vital. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#3)
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,061
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks CA
|
12.02.2007, 03:17 PM
the oemrc esc is rated at 100a, and i finally re-re-re-reread patrick's comment and i think i finally got it! id personally rather go with the 2230 as well because 1. it draws less amps 2. its a mild motor for a 1/5 scale, and if i ever build my brushless 6x6 mgt, that motor would be well suited for the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
