RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > Support Forums > Brushless

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#211)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 08:20 PM

Switching speed would be the sum of the on-state current rise/fall times.

IE: Rise = 4uS, Fall = 3uS. Total = 7uS so 1S/7uS = 142857.blah blah blah which is about 142 kHz.

Last edited by What's_nitro?; 03.31.2008 at 08:24 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#212)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:23 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG View Post
You can use a pistol radio with the existing setup - with a bit of tweaking. But I wouldn't want to use electrical brakes with voltages that high...
I did make it work with my pistol radio, but my vehicle has no option for mechanical brake. I like the brake that a car ESC have and if my brake system doesn't come to reality then the controller will have to offer me some braking to slow the car to a safe speed. Is this
(Resistive Switching Characteristics) where I look for the Switching Speed in the datasheet?
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#213)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 08:25 PM

It should be listed under the "dynamic characteristics" table.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#214)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:26 PM

Let me see the FDS5672 has a Rise Time of 20ns and a Fall Time of 14ns. The 60V MOSFET that I would like has a Rise Time of 15ns and a Fall Time of 5.5ns.
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#215)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 08:27 PM

Oo nS! I like it! That would be ~29 MHz for the first one and ~48 MHz for the second.

Last edited by What's_nitro?; 03.31.2008 at 08:30 PM.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#216)
BrianG
RC-Monster Admin
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
03.31.2008, 08:29 PM

Me too! Get it done man!
  Send a message via Yahoo to BrianG Send a message via MSN to BrianG  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#217)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro? View Post
Oo nS! I like it!
Is that good? If so I might just ask the MFG for enough samples to make 2 HV110 and extra if some fail.
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#218)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 08:32 PM

Billionths of a second is good. It means you could run higher-pole motors at higher speeds without cogging like the BK controllers.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#219)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:33 PM

You guys are going to turn me into an genius , but I do have to go with what Patrick says. If he gives the OK, then I'll try and get some stock on them. The 100V one I know there's stock of it, and the Tr is 15ns and the Tf is 9.3ns and will 0.01ohm make much difference?
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#220)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:36 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro? View Post
Billionths of a second is good. It means you could run higher-pole motors at higher speeds without cogging like the BK controllers.
I love learning new things. Too bad I can't make ESC and just thinking if I could, this hobby would get dangerous very quick. I hate to be the reason the government ban our R/C goodies.
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#221)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 08:39 PM

What is the current rating on the 100V? It's hard to say if the 0.01 ohm will matter, since there is usually less current flowing in a HV system the losses would be about the same as a LV but HC system with a lower resistance FET. Although 0.01 is about 5 times higher than average Rds for a FET.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#222)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:46 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro? View Post
What is the current rating on the 100V? It's hard to say if the 0.01 ohm will matter, since there is usually less current flowing in a HV system the losses would be about the same as a LV but HC system with a lower resistance FET. Although 0.01 is about 5 times higher than average Rds for a FET.
The 100V has the following specs: 100V, 34A cont., 0.023ohms, Tr is 15ns and the Tf is 9.3ns. The FDS5672 has a Rds of 0.01. SO would 0.013 make a lot of differance?
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#223)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 08:52 PM

Compared to the 0.01ohm that 0.013ohm would be 30% higher resistance and so 30% higher losses at a set current. A 10W loss would become a 13W loss and so forth. Since you would have a bunch of them in parallel to handle motor current it wont matter too much. I take it you would get a smokin' deal on these FETs- is that why you're so interested in them a not one with a lower Rds?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#224)
lutach
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
 
lutach's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
03.31.2008, 08:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro? View Post
Compared to the 0.01ohm that 0.013ohm would be 30% higher resistance and so 30% higher losses at a set current. A 10W loss would become a 13W loss and so forth. Since you would have a bunch of them in parallel to handle motor current it wont matter too much. I take it you would get a smokin' deal on these FETs- is that why you're so interested in them a not one with a lower Rds?
I won't buy them from the MFG just yet because it's really low QTY. When I do buy for my clients, it's really large QTYs and my prices are incredible. I'll buy them from whoever has stock and only the 100V one is showing in stock. I will have to check a couple more distributors to see if they have them. I'm going to see if I can get samples of the 60V one ASAP, if not the 100V will have to do.
  Send a message via MSN to lutach  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#225)
What's_nitro?
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
 
What's_nitro?'s Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
03.31.2008, 09:13 PM

Well a 23s controller would be pretty awesome...with 8p per phase you could easily put 10KW through that thing!
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com