|
05.28.2008, 06:37 PM
I think that if you were to make several runs with each ESC so that we could have some sort of larger sample size than a single run, it would be much more compelling evidence. I'm just not a believer after a single run.
It could be something as simple as a particular patch of track that had more traction that you didn't hit on one, but did with the other. Without a very controlled test such as a specific torque load on the wheels, it's really nowhere near accurate as too many other variables can pop up.
You guys take it for what it's worth, but I'm a firm believer that this data doesn't prove anything unless it's repeatable.
|