RC-Monster Forums  

Go Back   RC-Monster Forums > RC-Monster Area > General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old
  (#5)
Modding_out
disturb'in the peace......
 
Modding_out's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 395
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bloomsbury NJ, USA
11.18.2008, 02:06 AM

I did some more research an I have come to a major question. what suspension design is better? Pillow ball or king pin and c hub.

In my research I somehow came to the conclusion that PBS was a inferior design in comparison to CHS. But this is not the case, in the past it was the follow through design that made PBS inferior, ( as demonstrated in the pic above) not the concept. Nowadays, you see a more refined form of this suspension. In it's current form it is similar in all respects to the traxxas pbs which has proven it self durable since 1999.

On the other hand many are plagued with popping pillow balls which is a inherit weak spot in the concept. I am not aware of the Hpi Savage's CHS to have such inherit weak spots; why? because CHS is a far more hardy design in comparison.

Another factor to consider though, is that PBS uses less parts and is lighter than CHS. But even with it's weight benefits and ease of use you don't see Xray,Losi, AE or Kyosho with this suspension? So that alone leads me to believe that PBS is not up to the challenge, yet OFNA make's you pay more for this ''inferior'' design?

So the question still remains, which system rises Superior above it's competitor.......

Last edited by Modding_out; 11.18.2008 at 02:09 AM.
   
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump







Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com