 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
06.05.2010, 09:32 PM
if the testing equipment he is using is right...then sweet. proves a point....
as for the last paragraph...hes saying bashers pull 3c?
thats like saying " you bought a 500hp car, but its about the about 200 your typically gonna use" and dropping a 250hp motor in it instead
Last edited by Andrew32; 06.05.2010 at 09:34 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 4,236
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cape Cod, Mass.
|
06.05.2010, 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew32
if the testing equipment he is using is right...then sweet. proves a point....
as for the last paragraph...hes saying bashers pull 3c?
|
I think that he means that us bashers are harder on our batts. than racers. That's what I took out of it any way.
1. MBX-6 T8 1900KV, RX8 ON 4S
2. MBX-5T 1520, MMM ON 5S
3. MBX-5 ONROAD CONVERSION 1515, MMM ON 5S
4. MRX-3 ON ROAD CONVERSION 1512, MMM ON 6S
5. TEN T 2650 T8, MMP ON 3S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Brushless
Offline
Posts: 2,085
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
06.05.2010, 09:44 PM
I think he's referring to the average amp draw that we pull. Bashers and Racers alike.
If you've ever really looked at an Eagletree graph, they turn out to be alot of spikes.
Average amp draw is surprizingly low. Although, Amp Spikes for 1/8 scale can easily hit 150 amps.
These spikes only last for maybe 1/4th of a second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guest
|
06.05.2010, 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sikeston34m
I think he's referring to the average amp draw that we pull. Bashers and Racers alike.
If you've ever really looked at an Eagletree graph, they turn out to be alot of spikes.
Average amp draw is surprizingly low. Although, Amp Spikes for 1/8 scale can easily hit 150 amps.
These spikes only last for maybe 1/4th of a second.
|
ahh that makes sense. i really need to get myself a eagle tree...it sounds fun
as for the brand, i think it may be maxamps, my packs had the same yellow tape holding it together...but again i dont know if any other brands use that tape
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Brushless
Offline
Posts: 2,436
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonds WA
|
06.06.2010, 11:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew32
if the testing equipment he is using is right...then sweet. proves a point....
as for the last paragraph...hes saying bashers pull 3c?
thats like saying " you bought a 500hp car, but its about the about 200 your typically gonna use" and dropping a 250hp motor in it instead
|
Yes....your 500hp motor that you operate at 40% of its capacity is going to last much longer, and should be more efficient than a 250hp motor operated at 90-100% of capacity.
Losi 8T 1.0, Savage Flux - XL style, LST XXL, Muggy, 3.3 E-Revo Conversion and sitting outside 425hp, 831 Tq Dodge Ram Turbo Diesel. It SMOKES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
06.06.2010, 12:40 PM
IMO, this video means nothing without stating the brand name, lol, simply calling it a 'name brand' pack doesn't tell us anything.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
06.06.2010, 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JThiessen
Yes....your 500hp motor that you operate at 40% of its capacity is going to last much longer, and should be more efficient than a 250hp motor operated at 90-100% of capacity.
|
As for efficiency, can't really say that, depends on displacement, forced induction or not, whether it's a high speed/low torque, or low speed/high torque, anywhere in between, etc.
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Brushless
Offline
Posts: 2,436
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonds WA
|
06.06.2010, 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeropointbug
IMO, this video means nothing without stating the brand name, lol, simply calling it a 'name brand' pack doesn't tell us anything.
|
Why is that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeropointbug
As for efficiency, can't really say that, depends on displacement, forced induction or not, whether it's a high speed/low torque, or low speed/high torque, anywhere in between, etc.
|
True - shouldn't have thrown that in there.
Losi 8T 1.0, Savage Flux - XL style, LST XXL, Muggy, 3.3 E-Revo Conversion and sitting outside 425hp, 831 Tq Dodge Ram Turbo Diesel. It SMOKES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
06.06.2010, 03:30 PM
Don't you think it matters what brand it is? Is it just me?
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Mod
Offline
Posts: 4,217
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
|
06.06.2010, 04:47 PM
I think the point of this whole thing is that the "C" rating is total BS and im sure it is on all prands of lipo. If you did this same test on 10 different brands of lipo you would probably get the same results. Some would take 3 seconds to drop below 3v/cell and some of the better ones might take 2 or 3 times that long, but none would likely stand for a true constant discharge at the C rateing printed on the sticker.
Its all marketing BS.
I can't decide if its more fun
to make it...
or break it...
Silent...But Deadly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z-Pinch racer
Offline
Posts: 3,141
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SK, Canada
|
06.06.2010, 05:28 PM
Maybe so, but I still think it means nothing when they don't state what brand they are using. I could go get a crap brand LiFePO4 cell and test it to the rated C rating and get much lower volts than the manufacturer would provide, does that mean A123's are crap?
“The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the sun.” —Ralph E. Juergens
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |