 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 08:20 PM
Switching speed would be the sum of the on-state current rise/fall times.
IE: Rise = 4uS, Fall = 3uS. Total = 7uS so 1S/7uS = 142857.blah blah blah which is about 142 kHz.
Last edited by What's_nitro?; 03.31.2008 at 08:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 08:25 PM
It should be listed under the "dynamic characteristics" table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 08:27 PM
Oo nS! I like it! That would be ~29 MHz for the first one and ~48 MHz for the second.
Last edited by What's_nitro?; 03.31.2008 at 08:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
03.31.2008, 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro?
Oo nS! I like it!
|
Is that good? If so I might just ask the MFG for enough samples to make 2 HV110 and extra if some fail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
03.31.2008, 08:33 PM
You guys are going to turn me into an  genius  , but I do have to go with what Patrick says. If he gives the OK, then I'll try and get some stock on them. The 100V one I know there's stock of it, and the Tr is 15ns and the Tf is 9.3ns and will 0.01ohm make much difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
03.31.2008, 08:29 PM
Me too! Get it done man!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 08:32 PM
Billionths of a second is good. It means you could run higher-pole motors at higher speeds without cogging like the BK controllers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
03.31.2008, 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro?
Billionths of a second is good. It means you could run higher-pole motors at higher speeds without cogging like the BK controllers. 
|
I love learning new things. Too bad I can't make ESC and just thinking if I could, this hobby would get dangerous very quick. I hate to be the reason the government ban our R/C goodies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 08:39 PM
What is the current rating on the 100V? It's hard to say if the 0.01 ohm will matter, since there is usually less current flowing in a HV system the losses would be about the same as a LV but HC system with a lower resistance FET. Although 0.01 is about 5 times higher than average Rds for a FET.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
03.31.2008, 08:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro?
What is the current rating on the 100V? It's hard to say if the 0.01 ohm will matter, since there is usually less current flowing in a HV system the losses would be about the same as a LV but HC system with a lower resistance FET. Although 0.01 is about 5 times higher than average Rds for a FET.
|
The 100V has the following specs: 100V, 34A cont., 0.023ohms, Tr is 15ns and the Tf is 9.3ns. The FDS5672 has a Rds of 0.01. SO would 0.013 make a lot of differance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 08:52 PM
Compared to the 0.01ohm that 0.013ohm would be 30% higher resistance and so 30% higher losses at a set current. A 10W loss would become a 13W loss and so forth. Since you would have a bunch of them in parallel to handle motor current it wont matter too much. I take it you would get a smokin' deal on these FETs- is that why you're so interested in them a not one with a lower Rds?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
03.31.2008, 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by What's_nitro?
Compared to the 0.01ohm that 0.013ohm would be 30% higher resistance and so 30% higher losses at a set current. A 10W loss would become a 13W loss and so forth. Since you would have a bunch of them in parallel to handle motor current it wont matter too much. I take it you would get a smokin' deal on these FETs- is that why you're so interested in them a not one with a lower Rds?
|
I won't buy them from the MFG just yet because it's really low QTY. When I do buy for my clients, it's really large QTYs and my prices are incredible. I'll buy them from whoever has stock and only the 100V one is showing in stock. I will have to check a couple more distributors to see if they have them. I'm going to see if I can get samples of the 60V one ASAP, if not the 100V will have to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soldermaster Extraordinaire
Offline
Posts: 4,529
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Plymouth, MA, USA
|
03.31.2008, 09:13 PM
Well a 23s controller would be pretty awesome...with 8p per phase you could easily put 10KW through that thing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Admin
Offline
Posts: 14,609
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Des Moines, IA
|
03.31.2008, 11:26 PM
While it would be nice to have 100v capability, I wonder if it would be needed. Sure, the higher resistance won't matter much if using >50v, but most won't and companies have to manufacture for the majority, not the extreme monority.
OTOH, an ESC for portable transport (like bikes) would make good use of 100v FETs. It's all about target audience. I don't see someone placing a 27s pack in their R/C anytime soon! Just the wiring of the balancer plug(s) alone would be a nightmare! Maybe if someone came out with 10v cells...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RC-Monster Dual Brushless
Offline
Posts: 5,139
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
03.31.2008, 11:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianG
While it would be nice to have 100v capability, I wonder if it would be needed. Sure, the higher resistance won't matter much if using >50v, but most won't and companies have to manufacture for the majority, not the extreme monority.
OTOH, an ESC for portable transport (like bikes) would make good use of 100v FETs. It's all about target audience. I don't see someone placing a 27s pack in their R/C anytime soon! Just the wiring of the balancer plug(s) alone would be a nightmare! Maybe if someone came out with 10v cells...
|
The 100V can be used for only 12S lipos. My controllers are having 75V FETs in them, but they are rated for only 14S (15S max).
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
|
 |